Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 20;10(5):1181.
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10051181.

Challenges and the Evolving Landscape of Assessing Blood-Based PD-L1 Expression as a Biomarker for Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy

Affiliations
Review

Challenges and the Evolving Landscape of Assessing Blood-Based PD-L1 Expression as a Biomarker for Anti-PD-(L)1 Immunotherapy

Tao Wang et al. Biomedicines. .

Abstract

While promising, PD-L1 expression on tumor tissues as assessed by immunohistochemistry has been shown to be an imperfect biomarker that only applies to a limited number of cancers, whereas many patients with PD-L1-negative tumors still respond to anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. Recent studies using patient blood samples to assess immunotherapeutic responsiveness suggests a promising approach to the identification of novel and/or improved biomarkers for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the advances in our evolving understanding of the regulation and function of PD-L1 expression, which is the foundation for developing blood-based PD-L1 as a biomarker for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy. We further discuss current knowledge and clinical study results for biomarker identification using PD-L1 expression on tumor and immune cells, exosomes, and soluble forms of PD-L1 in the peripheral blood. Finally, we discuss key challenges for the successful development of the potential use of blood-based PD-L1 as a biomarker for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy.

Keywords: PD-1; PD-L1; anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy; biomarker; circulating immune cells; circulating tumor cells; exosomal PD-L1; immune checkpoint inhibitor; liquid biopsy; plasma PD-L1.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Morad G., Helmink B.A., Sharma P., Wargo J.A. Hallmarks of response, resistance, and toxicity to immune checkpoint blockade. Cell. 2021;184:5309–5337. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.09.020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olivier T., Haslam A., Prasad V. Anticancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration From 2009 to 2020 According to Their Mechanism of Action. JAMA Netw. Open. 2021;4:e2138793. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.38793. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolchok J.D., Chiarion-Sileni V., Gonzalez R., Grob J.-J., Rutkowski P., Lao C.D., Cowey C.L., Schadendorf D., Wagstaff J., Dummer R., et al. Long-Term Outcomes with Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone Versus Ipilimumab in Patients with Advanced Melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:127–137. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02229. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Korman A.J., Garrett-Thomson S.C., Lonberg N. The foundations of immune checkpoint blockade and the ipilimumab approval decennial. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00345-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalbasi A., Ribas A. Tumour-intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:25–39. doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0218-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed