Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 19;14(10):2491.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14102491.

Antagonizing Glutamine Bioavailability Promotes Radiation Sensitivity in Prostate Cancer

Affiliations

Antagonizing Glutamine Bioavailability Promotes Radiation Sensitivity in Prostate Cancer

Manish Thiruvalluvan et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Nearly half of localized prostate cancer (PCa) patients given radiation therapy develop recurrence. Here, we identified glutamine as a key player in mediating the radio-sensitivity of PCa. Glutamine transporters and glutaminase are upregulated by radiation therapy of PCa cells, but respective inhibitors were ineffective in radio-sensitization. However, targeting glutamine bioavailability by L-asparaginase (L-ASP) led to a significant reduction in clonogenicity when combined with irradiation. L-ASP reduced extracellular asparagine and glutamine, but the sensitization effects were driven through its depletion of glutamine. L-ASP led to G2/M cell cycle checkpoint blockade. As evidence, there was a respective delay in DNA repair associated with RAD51 downregulation and upregulation of CHOP, contributing to radiation-induced cell death. A radio-resistant PCa cell line was developed, was found to bypass radiation-induced mitotic catastrophe, and was sensitive to L-ASP/radiation combination treatment. Previously, PCa-associated fibroblasts were reported as a glutamine source supporting tumor progression. As such, glutamine-free media were not effective in promoting radiation-induced PCa cell death when co-cultured with associated primary fibroblasts. However, the administration L-ASP catalyzed glutamine depletion with irradiated co-cultures and catalyzed tumor volume reduction in a mouse model. The clinical history of L-ASP for leukemia patients supports the viability for its repurposing as a radio-sensitizer for PCa patients.

Keywords: asparaginase; glutamine; prostate cancer; radiation therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Glutamine is a conditionally essential amino acid for prostate cancer. (A) Fold change of SLC1A5, SLC38A1, SLC38A2, and SLC38A7 in benign and prostate cancer patients in the gse29079 data set, obtained from R2-Genomics analysis (n = 95). (B) 22RV1 cells were counted 72 h after culturing in media containing the indicated concentrations of glutamine (L-Gln). (C) ARCaPM cells were counted 72 h after culturing in media containing the indicated concentrations of L-Gln. (D) 22RV1 were irradiated (4 Gy) and counted 72 h after culturing in media containing L-Gln (0 or 2 mM), with and without administration of GPNA (100 µM) or CB839 (1 µM). Cell counts are reported as a mean ± SD of at least three biologic replicates (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, compared to control).
Figure 2
Figure 2
L-ASP reduces viability of PCa cells through depletion of glutamine, not asparagine. (A) 22RV1 and ARCaPM cultured cells were counted following the indicated dose of irradiation in the context of L-Gln (0 or 2 mM) and/or L-ASP (0 or 2 IU/mL). (B) Clonogenic assays with 22RV1 cells were quantitated following 0 or 2 Gy of radiation, in the presence of increasing levels of L-Gln (0. 0.5, 2, 4, and 10) or 2 mM L-Gln with 2 IU/ mL L-ASP. (C) Clonogenic assays of 22RV1 and ARCaPM cells were performed 10 days after administering untreated or L-ASP-treated media. L-Gln and L-Asn was added back to L-ASP-treated media. Cell counting shows short-term effects (72 h) under the same conditions. (D) Cell cycle analysis was performed on 22RV1 and ARCaPM cells following incubation under control conditions or treatment with L-ASP-treated media for 72 h. (E) Graphic shows that L-ASP effects in PCa cells by the depletion of extracellular glutamine, not asparagine. Cell counts are reported as a mean ± SD (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001, compared to control).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Glutamine depletion leads to cell cycle arrest and cell death. 22RV1 cells were pre-treated with L-ASP (2 IU/mL), enzalutamide (10 µM), or both for 24 h. Cells were harvested 4 or 24 h after the indicated doses of irradiation (IRR). (A) The mRNA expression of G1/S (CDK4, CDK6, and CCDN1) and G2/M checkpoint markers (p21, CDK1, CCNB1, and PCNA) was determined by RT-PCR. mRNA expression was normalized to ß-actin and untreated samples. (B) Propidium iodide-stained cells were subjected to cell cycle analysis by FACS 4 and 24 h after irradiation. (C) Apoptotic status of cells 4 and 24 h after irradiation was determined by FACS analysis of cell surface annexin V. All studies are reported as a mean of at least three independent experiments (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 4
Figure 4
L-ASP potentiates IR effects by delaying DNA damage repair. 22RV1 cells were pre-treated with L-ASP (2 IU/mL), enzalutamide (10 µM), or both for 24 h. Cells were harvested at the indicated times after irradiation (0 or 4 Gy). (A) Western blots of 22RV1 cell lysates were probed for PARP, cleaved PARP, ATF4, CHOP, p27, p21, survivin, and p-γ-H2Ax. Representative blots are shown with the mean relative quantitation indicated normalized to ß-actin expression. Molecular weights (kDa) are indicated. (B) mRNA expression of DNA damage repair genes was measured by RT-PCR. Data are reported as a mean of three independent experiments.
Figure 5
Figure 5
L-ASP sensitizes radio-resistant PCa to irradiation. (A) Representative images highlight morphological differences in parental ARCaPM and ARCaPM-IR cells; Scale bar, 250 μm. (B) Clonogenic assays performed with ARCaPM and ARCaPM-IR cells were quantified 10 days after treatment with L-ASP, enzalutamide, or both, with and without irradiation (2 Gy). Solubilized CFUs were normalized to the untreated control. (C) Parental ARCaPM and ARCaPM-IR cell were counted 72 h after administering L-ASP, enzalutamide, and/or irradiation (4 Gy). (D) Cell cycle analysis of ARCaPM and ARCaPM-IR 24 h after L-ASP, enzalutamide, and/or irradiation (4 Gy) was analyzed by FACS using propidium iodide staining. (E) ARCaPM and ARCaPM-IR cell surface CD44 expression was measured by FACS 24 h after L-ASP, enzalutamide, and/or irradiation (4 Gy). (F) mRNA expression of DNA damage repair proteins and reactive oxygen species (ROS) regulators were measured. All studies are reported as a mean of at least three independent experiments (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001).
Figure 6
Figure 6
PCa radio-resistance mediated by CAFs can be countered by administering L-ASP. (A) CAFs were counted after administration of L-ASP (2 IU/mL), CB839 (1 µM), or GPNA (100 µM) 24 h after irradiation (4 Gy). (B) CAFs were counted after incubation with untreated and L-ASP-treated media with or without supplementation of L-Gln, L-Asn, or both. (C) Cells treated under the same conditions were subjected to FACS analysis for annexin V expression. (D) Cell cycle analysis was performed on CAFs following incubation with untreated and L-ASP-treated media with or without supplementation of L-Gln, L-Asn, or both. (E) ARCaPM cells co-cultured with CAFs in a trans-well were counted following incubation in L-ASP-treated media supplemented with enzalutamide (10 µM) and/or 2 mM L-Gln. Irradiation status of the co-cultures is indicated. (F) Schematic overview of xenograft experiment where athymic nude mice were grafted with ARCaPM and CAFs in a 1:3 ratio subcutaneously. (G) Mice were administered L-ASP (125 IU) or vehicle prior to and after receiving irradiation (5 Gy) as indicated (n = 6). Tumor volume fold change was normalized to the first dose of L-ASP. Multiple comparison ANOVA was performed. (H) A graphic shows the revealed mechanism of how L-ASP acts as a radio-sensitizer in prostate tumors. All studies are reported as a mean of at least three independent experiments (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Teo M.Y., Rathkopf D.E., Kantoff P. Treatment of Advanced Prostate Cancer. Annu. Rev. Med. 2019;70:479–499. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-051517-011947. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rawla P. Epidemiology of Prostate Cancer. World J. Oncol. 2019;10:63–89. doi: 10.14740/wjon1191. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gay H.A., Michalski J.M. Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Mo. Med. 2018;115:146–150. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Payne H.A., Hughes S. Radical Radiotherapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer in Older Men. Oncologist. 2012;17((Suppl. S1)):9–15. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-S1-09. - DOI - PMC - PubMed