Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
- PMID: 35626136
- PMCID: PMC9139274
- DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102532
Clinical and Economic Impact of a Multidisciplinary Follow-Up Program in Lymphoma Patients
Abstract
Objectives: The UMACOACH Lymphoma is a multidisciplinary monitoring program for patients initiating a first highly haematotoxic treatment for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Patient follow-up is based on consultation with a pharmacist and planed phone calls by nurses supervised by a clinical haematologist. Our objective was to assess effectiveness and cost of the UMACOACH Lymphoma Program (ULP) and to investigate patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL). Methods: This French monocentric case-control study included all patients enrolled in the ULP over a one-year period (cases) matched with retrospective patients receiving usual care (controls). Numbers of adverse events (AEs), re-hospitalisations, average relative dose intensity (ARDI), treatment response and survival were compared between the two groups. Among cases, patient satisfaction and QoL using the EORTC-QLQC30 questionnaire before and after treatment were evaluated. Results: Seventy-eight cases were matched to 78 controls. Twenty-six percent grade 3−4 AEs were observed in cases versus 38% in controls (p = 0.001). There were 76 and 88 re-hospitalisations in the case and control groups, respectively (p = 0.217). ARDI > 85% was observed in 92% and 82% of cases and controls, respectively (p = 0.138). No differences were observed in terms of treatment responses and survival. Estimated cost savings were of EUR 81,782 in favour of the case group. An improvement of 5.1 points was observed in the total QoL score before and after treatment in cases. Conclusions: A nurse−pharmacist−haematologist collaboration seems to be promising to reduce grade 3−4 AEs in HL and NHL patients receiving highly haematotoxic chemotherapy regimens. Cost savings from hospitalisation being avoided were also shown.
Keywords: follow-up; haematotoxicity; immunochemotherapy; lymphoma; nurse; pharmacist; quality of life.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures





References
-
- Laurent C., Baron M., Amara N., Haioun C., Dandoit M., Maynadié M., Parrens M., Vergier B., Copie-Bergman C., Fabiani B., et al. Impact of Expert Pathologic Review of Lymphoma Diagnosis: Study of Patients From the French Lymphopath Network. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017;35:2008–2017. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.2083. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Coiffier B., Lepage E., Brière J., Herbrecht R., Tilly H., Bouabdallah R., Morel P., Van Den Neste E., Salles G., Gaulard P., et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002;346:235–242. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011795. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Fitoussi O., Belhadj K., Mounier N., Parrens M., Tilly H., Salles G., Feugier P., Ferme C., Ysebaert L., Gabarre J., et al. Survival Impact of Rituximab Combined with ACVBP and Upfront Consolidation Autotransplantation in High-Risk Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma for GELA. Haematologica. 2011;96:1136–1143. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2010.038109. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources