Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Apr 23;12(5):1056.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051056.

Cervical Spine Manipulations: Role of Diagnostic Procedures, Effectiveness, and Safety from a Rehabilitation and Forensic Medicine Perspective: A Systematic Review

Affiliations
Review

Cervical Spine Manipulations: Role of Diagnostic Procedures, Effectiveness, and Safety from a Rehabilitation and Forensic Medicine Perspective: A Systematic Review

Andrea Bernetti et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Cervical spine manipulations (CSM) have been performed for centuries and are a widely practiced intervention to manage cervical spine musculoskeletal disorders. We aimed to perform an overview of the literature concerning the effects and the adverse events of CSM in the Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (PRM) field with a forensic medicine perspective.

Methods: A search in the scientific literature (PubMed, Google Scholar, PEDro and Cochrane) was carried out from inception until October 2020.

Results: Fourteen articles were included in this narrative summary. The possible development of side effects requires a careful mandatory balance of benefits and risks even when there is an indication for this approach. Moreover, a qualified professional is essential to perform CSM-a non-invasive therapeutic procedure that can be potentially harmful.

Conclusions: In conclusion, it is essential to perform the diagnosis, to treat, and to manage complications within the PRM field, both for the reduction of malpractice claims and, most importantly, for the safety of the patient.

Keywords: cervical artery dissection; cervical spine manipulations; forensic medicine; manipulative therapy; rehabilitation; side effects; spine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA 2020 Flow Diagram.

References

    1. World Health Organization . WHO Guidelines on Basic Training and Safety in Chiropractic. Volume 4 WHO Press, World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2005.
    1. Tinel D., Bliznakova E., Juhel C., Gallien P., Brissot R. Vertebrobasilar ischemia after cervical spine manipulation: A case report. Ann. Readapt. Med. Phys. 2008;51:403–414. doi: 10.1016/j.annrmp.2008.04.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen Q., Feng J.F., Tang X., Li Y.L., Chen L., Chen G. Cervical epidural hematoma after spinal manipulation therapy: A case report. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 2019;20:461. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2871-y. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reuter U., Hämling M., Kavuk I., Einhäupl K.M., Schielke E. Vertebral artery dissections after chiropractic neck manipulation in Germany over three years. J. Neurol. 2006;253:724–730. doi: 10.1007/s00415-006-0099-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Evans D.W. Mechanisms and effects of spinal high-velocity, low-amplitude thrust manipulation: Previous theories. J Manip. Physiol. Ther. 2002;25:251–262. doi: 10.1067/mmt.2002.123166. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources