Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 4;12(5):1140.
doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12051140.

Clinical Evaluation of an Innovative Metal-Artifact-Reduction Algorithm in FD-CT Angiography in Cerebral Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Coiling or Surgical Clipping

Affiliations

Clinical Evaluation of an Innovative Metal-Artifact-Reduction Algorithm in FD-CT Angiography in Cerebral Aneurysms Treated by Endovascular Coiling or Surgical Clipping

Felix Eisenhut et al. Diagnostics (Basel). .

Abstract

Treated cerebral aneurysms (IA) require follow-up imaging to ensure occlusion. Metal artifacts complicate radiologic assessment. Our aim was to evaluate an innovative metal-artifact-reduction (iMAR) algorithm for flat-detector computed tomography angiography (FD-CTA) regarding image quality (IQ) and detection of aneurysm residua/reperfusion in comparison to 2D digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Patients with IAs treated by endovascular coiling or clipping underwent both FD-CTA and DSA. FD-CTA datasets were postprocessed with/without iMAR algorithm (MAR+/MAR−). Evaluation of all FD-CTA and DSA datasets regarding qualitative (IQ, MAR) and quantitative (coil package diameter/CPD) parameters was performed. Aneurysm occlusion was assessed for each dataset and compared to DSA findings. In total, 40 IAs were analyzed (ncoiling = 24; nclipping = 16). All iMAR+ datasets demonstrated significantly better IQ (pIQ coiling < 0.0001; pIQ clipping < 0.0001). iMAR significantly reduced the metal-artifact burden but did not affect the CPD. iMAR significantly improved the detection of aneurysm residua/reperfusion with excellent agreement with DSA (naneurysm detection MAR+/MAR−/DSA = 22/1/26). The iMAR algorithm significantly improves IQ by effective reduction of metal artifacts in FD-CTA datasets. The proposed algorithm enables reliable detection of aneurysm residua/reperfusion with good agreement to DSA. Thus, iMAR can help to reduce the need for invasive follow-up in treated IAs.

Keywords: cerebral aneurysm; endovascular coiling; flat-detector computed tomography angiography; metal-artifact-reduction algorithm; surgical clipping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of the iMAR technique. The interpolation-based iMAR technique is described in detail by Meyer et al. [21,22].
Figure 2
Figure 2
A 63-year-old patient with an aneurysm of the basilar artery in the initial DSA ((A) red arrow) with consecutive treatment via endovascular coiling (B). Six months later, DSA control revealed a reperfusion in the aneurysm center ((C) red arrow). The aneurysm was not assessable in iMAR− FD-CTA due to severe metal artifacts (D). After application of iMAR and the following significant metal artifact reduction, FD-CTA also demonstrated reperfusion in the aneurysm center ((E) red arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
An 84-year-old patient with an aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery in the initial DSA ((A) red arrow) with consecutive treatment via endovascular coiling (B). Six months later, DSA control revealed a reperfusion at the aneurysm base ((C) red arrow). The aneurysm was not assessable in iMAR− FD-CTA due to severe metal artifacts (D). Thanks to a significant metal artifact reduction, iMAR+ FD-CTA also demonstrated the basal aneurysm reperfusion in accordance with the DSA ((E) marked with red dotted line).
Figure 4
Figure 4
An 80-year-old patient with an aneurysm of the right posterior communicating artery treated via intracranial clipping. DSA control revealed a small residuum at the aneurysm neck ((A) red arrow). The aneurysm was not assessable in iMAR− FD-CTA due to severe metal artifacts (B). After application of iMAR and the following significant metal artifact reduction, FD-CTA also demonstrated the small residuum ((C) red arrow).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Side-by-side examples of FD-CTA images without/with application of the iMAR (iMAR−/iMAR+) in patients with treated intracranial aneurysms via endovascular coiling. Upper row shows a patient with a treated aneurysm of the anterior communicating artery, basal row shows a patient with a treated aneurysm of the internal carotid artery. In the iMAR− images of both cases, the parent vessels are not (upper case) or poorly differentiable (basal case), whereas in the iMAR+ images, the parent vessels are very well differentiable.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Exemplary CPD measurement in iMAR−/+ FD-CTA images. CPD is indicated by the red arrow.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Evaluation of IQ regarding diagnostic value in patients with coiled (A) and clipped (B) IAs. The iMAR algorithm significantly improves IQ. Evaluation of IQ regarding metal-artifact burden in patients with coiled (C) and clipped (D) IAs. The iMAR algorithm significantly reduced metal-artifact burden in all cases. (E) Number of detected aneurysm reperfusions in patients treated via endovascular coiling. iMAR+ FD-CTA allows better aneurysm reperfusion detection with good agreement with DSA reference in comparison with iMAR− images. (F) Number of detected aneurysm residua in patients treated via surgical clipping. iMAR+ FD-CTA allows better aneurysm residua detection in comparison with iMAR− images. p-values less than 0.0001 are marked with “****”.

References

    1. Rinkel G.J., Djibuti M., Algra A., van Gijn J. Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review. Stroke. 1998;29:251–256. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.29.1.251. - DOI - PubMed
    1. International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Investigators Unruptured intracranial aneurysms--risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998;339:1725–1733. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812103392401. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Macdonald R.L., Schweizer T.A. Spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2017;389:655–666. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30668-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van Gijn J., Kerr R.S., Rinkel G.J. Subarachnoid haemorrhage. Lancet. 2007;369:306–318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60153-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Steiner T., Juvela S., Unterberg A., Jung C., Forsting M., Rinkel G. European Stroke Organization guidelines for the management of intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cerebrovasc. Dis. 2013;35:93–112. doi: 10.1159/000346087. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources