Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Apr 21;9(5):587.
doi: 10.3390/children9050587.

Percutaneous Anorectoplasty (PARP)-An Adaptable, Minimal-Invasive Technique for Anorectal Malformation Repair

Affiliations

Percutaneous Anorectoplasty (PARP)-An Adaptable, Minimal-Invasive Technique for Anorectal Malformation Repair

Julia Küppers et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Anorectal malformations comprise a broad spectrum of disease. We developed a percutaneous anorectoplasty (PARP) technique as a minimal-invasive option for repair of amenable types of lesions.

Methods: Patients who underwent PARP at five institutions from 2008 through 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Demographic information, details of the operative procedure, and perioperative complications and outcomes were collected.

Results: A total of 10 patients underwent the PARP procedure during the study interval. Patients either had low perineal malformations or no appreciable fistula. Most procedures were guided by ultrasound, fluoroscopy, or endoscopy. Median age at PARP was 3 days (range 1 to 311) days; eight patients were male. Only one intraoperative complication occurred, prompting conversion to posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. Functional outcomes in most children were highly satisfactory in terms of continence and functionality.

Conclusions: The PARP technique is an excellent minimal-invasive alternative for boys born with perineal fistulae, as well as patients of both sexes without fistulae. The optimal type of guidance (ultrasound, fluoroscopy, or endoscopy) depends on the anatomy of the lesion and the presence of a colostomy at the time of repair.

Keywords: Down syndrome; anorectal malformation; anorectoplasty; endoscopy; fluoroscopy; keyword; percutaneous; perineal fistula; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot of Video S1. Typical perineal fistula with bucket-handle in a boy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ultrasound image during uPARP showing the guidance of the needle (arrow) towards the meconium-filled rectal pouch.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Technique of iPARP. The needle and guidewire are introduced into the rectum through the sphincter complex (a) under fluoroscopic guidance (b). A balloon dilator is advanced over the guidewire (c) to dilate the tract (d).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Screenshot of Video S2. Trans-neoanal endoscopic view of the anastomosis being con-structed.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Star-shaped end of the rectal pouch marking the future tract towards the sphincter complex (*).

References

    1. Levitt M.A., Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Fundam. Pediatr. Surg. 2011;2:499–512.
    1. Pakarinen M.P., Rintala R.J. Management and outcome of low anorectal malformations. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2010;26:1057–1063. doi: 10.1007/s00383-010-2697-z. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tofft L., Salö M., Arnbjörnsson E., Stenström P. Wound dehiscence after posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in children with anorectal malformations. BioMed Res. Int. 2018;2018:2930783. doi: 10.1155/2018/2930783. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Karakus S.C., User I.R., Akcaer V., Ceylan H., Ozokutan B.H. Posterior sagittal anorectoplasty in vestibular fistula: With or without colostomy. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2017;33:755–759. doi: 10.1007/s00383-017-4102-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Divarci E., Ergun O. General complications after surgery for anorectal malformations. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2020;36:431–445. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04629-9. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources