Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 11;19(10):5865.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105865.

Non-Standard Employment and Unemployment during the COVID-19 Crisis: Economic and Health Findings from a Six-Country Survey Study

Affiliations

Non-Standard Employment and Unemployment during the COVID-19 Crisis: Economic and Health Findings from a Six-Country Survey Study

Virginia Gunn et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The COVID-19 crisis is a global event that has created and amplified social inequalities, including an already existing and steadily increasing problem of employment and income insecurity and erosion of workplace rights, affecting workers globally. The aim of this exploratory study was to review employment-related determinants of health and health protection during the pandemic, or more specifically, to examine several links between non-standard employment, unemployment, economic, health, and safety outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Sweden, Belgium, Spain, Canada, the United States, and Chile, based on an online survey conducted from November 2020 to June 2021. The study focused on both non-standard workers and unemployed workers and examined worker outcomes in the context of current type and duration of employment arrangements, as well as employment transitions triggered by the COVID-19 crisis. The results suggest that COVID-19-related changes in non-standard worker employment arrangements, or unemployment, are related to changes in work hours, income, and benefits, as well as the self-reported prevalence of suffering from severe to extreme anxiety or depression. The results also suggest a link between worker type, duration of employment arrangements, or unemployment, and the ability to cover regular expenses during the pandemic. Additionally, the findings indicate that the type and duration of employment arrangements are related to the provision of personal protective equipment or other COVID-19 protection measures. This study provides additional evidence that workers in non-standard employment and the unemployed have experienced numerous and complex adverse effects of the pandemic and require additional protection through tailored pandemic responses and recovery strategies.

Keywords: atypical employment; health equity; income and employment insecurities; lack of workplace rights; mental health; occupational health and safety; pandemic responses and recovery strategies; poverty; social inequalities; transitions towards non-standard employment and unemployment; worker health and well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funder had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of respondents indicating changes in work hours, work income, and benefits compared to the job held or situation before the COVID-19 crisis, by country and by employment transition. (a) Changes in work hours, (b) Changes in work income, and (c) Changes in benefits. Notes: N represents the total sample of participants with jointly defined values for the employment transitions and changes in work hours, work income, and benefits questions. More specifically, for figure (c) NG represents the total sample of participants who gained benefits and NL the total sample of participants who lost benefits.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of respondents indicating changes in work hours, work income, and benefits compared to the job held or situation before the COVID-19 crisis, by country and by employment transition. (a) Changes in work hours, (b) Changes in work income, and (c) Changes in benefits. Notes: N represents the total sample of participants with jointly defined values for the employment transitions and changes in work hours, work income, and benefits questions. More specifically, for figure (c) NG represents the total sample of participants who gained benefits and NL the total sample of participants who lost benefits.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Proportion of respondents indicating changes in work hours, work income, and benefits compared to the job held or situation before the COVID-19 crisis, by country and by employment transition. (a) Changes in work hours, (b) Changes in work income, and (c) Changes in benefits. Notes: N represents the total sample of participants with jointly defined values for the employment transitions and changes in work hours, work income, and benefits questions. More specifically, for figure (c) NG represents the total sample of participants who gained benefits and NL the total sample of participants who lost benefits.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Proportion of respondents indicating that they are severely or extremely anxious or depressed, by country and by employment transition. Notes: For each country, N represents the total sample of participants with jointly defined values for the employment transitions and the self-declared anxiety and depression questions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Pooled logistic regression analysis of predictors of severe or extreme anxiety or depression. Notes: SE = standard employment; NSE = non-standard employment arrangement. Reference category = same NSE. Model adjusted for age, gender, and education.

References

    1. ILO . COVID-19: Social Protection Systems Failing Vulnerable Groups. International Labour Office; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020.
    1. ILO . ILO Monitor: COVID-19 and the World of Work. International Labour Office; Geneva, Switzerland: 2021.
    1. ILO . World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2022. International Labour Office; Geneva, Switzerland: 2022.
    1. Quinlan M., Mayhew C., Bohle P. The global expansion of precarious employment, work disorganization, and consequences for occupational health: A review of recent research. Int. J. Health Serv. 2001;31:335–414. doi: 10.2190/607H-TTV0-QCN6-YLT4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. UN . A UN Framework for the Immediate Socio-Economic Response to COVID-19. United Nations; Geneva, Switzerland: 2020.

Publication types