Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 11;12(10):1640.
doi: 10.3390/nano12101640.

The Graphene Structure's Effects on the Current-Voltage and Photovoltaic Characteristics of Directly Synthesized Graphene/n-Si(100) Diodes

Affiliations

The Graphene Structure's Effects on the Current-Voltage and Photovoltaic Characteristics of Directly Synthesized Graphene/n-Si(100) Diodes

Šarūnas Jankauskas et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

Graphene was synthesized directly on Si(100) substrates by microwave plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (MW-PECVD). The effects of the graphene structure on the electrical and photovoltaic properties of graphene/n-Si(100) were studied. The samples were investigated using Raman spectroscopy, atomic force microscopy, and by measuring current-voltage (I-V) graphs. The temperature of the hydrogen plasma annealing prior to graphene synthesis was an essential parameter regarding the graphene/Si contact I-V characteristics and photovoltaic parameters. Graphene n-type self-doping was found to occur due to the native SiO2 interlayer at the graphene/Si junction. It was the prevalent cause of the significant decrease in the reverse current and short-circuit current. No photovoltaic effect dependence on the graphene roughness and work function could be observed.

Keywords: MW-PECVD; graphene; photovoltaics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of the graphene/n-Si(100) fabricated diodes.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Typical Raman scattering spectra (a) and typical I−V characteristics (b) of directly synthesized graphene/Si(100) devices. The I−V characteristics of the device produced from the C2 sample exhibited diode behavior (red), ohmic contact was seen for the device produced from a sample B3 (green), and the A1 sample had diode-like I-V features (blue).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relation between different Raman scattering spectra parameters: (a) I2D/IG vs. ID/IG; (b) FWHM2D vs. I2D/IG; (c) Pos2D vs. I2D/IG; (d) Pos2D vs. PosG; (e) FWHM2D vs. Pos2D; (f) FWHM2D vs. FWHMG. Samples were grouped according to the temperature of Si(100) substrate hydrogen plasma annealing before graphene growth: 700 °C (red), 800 °C (green), 900 °C (blue).
Figure 4
Figure 4
I−V characteristic parameters (IR(0.3 V), IR(0.1 V)/IF(0.1 V), IR(0.3 V)/IF(0.3 V)) in relation with: (ac) FWHMG; (df) Pos2D; and (gi) FWHM2D. Samples were grouped according to the temperature of Si(100) substrate hydrogen plasma annealing before graphene growth: 700 °C (red), 800 °C (green), 900 °C (blue).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Typical I−V characteristics of directly synthesized graphene/Si heterojunctions measured under the illumination by 800 nm wavelength (solid) and 406 nm wavelength (dashed) LEDs.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Structural effects on graphene/Si(100) diode’s photovoltaic parameters at 800 nm illumination: (a) ISC vs. I2D/IG plot; (b) UOC and I2D/IG relation; (c) ISC relation with FWHM2D; (d) UOC vs. FWHM2D plot; (e) ISC with respect to Raman 2D peak position; and (f) ISC and PosG correlation. Samples were grouped according to the temperature of Si(100) substrate hydrogen plasma annealing before graphene growth: 700 °C (red), 800 °C (green), 900 °C (blue).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Diode I−V and photovoltaic parameter (at 800 nm illumination) relation: (a) ISC vs. IR(0.3 V) plot; ISC correlation with diode’s I-V curve shape estimated using reverse and forward current ratio measured at 0.1 V (b) and 0.3 V (c); UOC vs. ISC/IR(0.3 V) plot (d) (solid and hollow markers indicate device illumination at 800 and 406 nm, respectively).

References

    1. Novoselov K.S. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science. 2004;306:666–669. doi: 10.1126/science.1102896. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nair R.R., Blake P., Grigorenko A.N., Novoselov K.S., Booth T.J., Stauber T., Peres N.M.R., Geim A.K. Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene. Science. 2008;320:1308. doi: 10.1126/science.1156965. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morozov S.V., Novoselov K.S., Katsnelson M.I., Schedin F., Elias D.C., Jaszczak J.A., Geim A.K. Giant Intrinsic Carrier Mobilities in Graphene and Its Bilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2008;100:016602. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.016602. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee C., Wei X., Kysar J.W., Hone J. Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene. Science. 2008;321:385–388. doi: 10.1126/science.1157996. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bonaccorso F., Sun Z., Hasan T., Ferrari A.C. Graphene Photonics and Optoelectronics. Nat. Photonics. 2010;4:611–622. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2010.186. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources