Modelling the Impact of Mass Testing to Transition from Pandemic Mitigation to Endemic COVID-19
- PMID: 35632707
- PMCID: PMC9145947
- DOI: 10.3390/v14050967
Modelling the Impact of Mass Testing to Transition from Pandemic Mitigation to Endemic COVID-19
Abstract
As countries transition from pandemic mitigation to endemic COVID-19, mass testing may blunt the impact on the healthcare system of the liminal wave. We used GeoDEMOS-R, an agent-based model of Singapore's population with demographic distributions and vaccination status. A 250-day COVID-19 Delta variant model was run at varying maximal rapid antigen test sensitivities and frequencies. Without testing, the number of infections reached 1,021,000 (899,400-1,147,000) at 250 days. When conducting fortnightly and weekly mass routine rapid antigen testing 30 days into the outbreak at a maximal test sensitivity of 0.6, this was reduced by 12.8% (11.3-14.5%) and 25.2% (22.5-28.5%). An increase in maximal test sensitivity of 0.2 results a corresponding reduction of 17.5% (15.5-20.2%) and 34.4% (30.5-39.1%). Within the maximal test sensitivity range of 0.6-0.8, test frequency has a greater impact than maximal test sensitivity with an average reduction of 2.2% in infections for each day removed between tests in comparison to a 0.43% average reduction per 1% increase in test frequency. Our findings highlight that mass testing using rapid diagnostic tests can be used as an effective intervention for countries transitioning from pandemic mitigation to endemic COVID-19.
Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; agent-based model; endemicity; mass testing; rapid antigen test.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures





References
-
- Barda N., Dagan N., Cohen C., Hernán M.A., Lipsitch M., Kohane I.S., Reis B.Y., Balicer R.D. Effectiveness of a Third Dose of the BNT162b2 MRNA COVID-19 Vaccine for Preventing Severe Outcomes in Israel: An Observational Study. Lancet. 2021;398:2093–2100. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02249-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Lindner A.K., Nikolai O., Kausch F., Wintel M., Hommes F., Gertler M., Krüger L.J., Gaeddert M., Tobian F., Lainati F., et al. Head-to-Head Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen-Detecting Rapid Test with Self-Collected Nasal Swab versus Professional-Collected Nasopharyngeal Swab. Eur. Respir. J. 2021;57:2003961. doi: 10.1183/13993003.03961-2020. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mboumba Bouassa R.-S., Veyer D., Péré H., Bélec L. Analytical Performances of the Point-of-Care SIENNATM COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Test for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid Protein in Nasopharyngeal Swabs: A Prospective Evaluation during the COVID-19 Second Wave in France. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2021;106:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.051. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Katherine_Chen PMO|PM Lee Hsien Loong on the COVID-19 “New Normal”. [(accessed on 28 March 2022)]; Available online: https://www.pmo.gov.sg/Newsroom/PM-Lee-Hsien-Loong-COVID-19-New-Normal-3....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous