Therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh class A or B liver function in real-world clinical practice
- PMID: 35633504
- DOI: 10.1111/hepr.13797
Therapeutic efficacy of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with Child-Pugh class A or B liver function in real-world clinical practice
Abstract
Background/aim: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment is recommended for unresechepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) patients classified as Child-Pugh A (CP-A). This study aimed to elucidate the prognosis of patients treated with Atez/Bev, especially CP-A and -B cases.
Materials/methods: From September 2020 to March 2022, 457 u-HCC patients treated with Atez/Bev were enrolled (median age 74 years, male:female = 368:89, CP-A:CP-B = 427:30, Child-Pugh score [CPS] 5:6:7:8:9 = 271:156:21:8:1). Therapeutic response was evaluated using RECIST ver.1.1. Clinical features and prognosis were retrospectively evaluated.
Results: There were no significant differences between CP-A and -B patients in regard to best response (CR:PR:SD:PD = 16:91:194:81 vs. 0:7:13:8, p = 0.739; objective response rate/disease control rate = 28.0%/78.8% vs. 25.0%/71.4%). Analysis performed using inverse probability weighting adjustments of clinical factors other than those related to hepatic reserve function with a p value < 0.10 for comparisons between patients with CP-A and -B showed that the progression-free survival (PFS) rate for CP-A cases was better (6-/12-/18-month: 58.2%/36.1%/27.8% vs. 49.6%/8.7%/non-estimable [NE], p < 0.001), as was overall survival (OS) rate (6-/12-/18-month: 89.9%/71.7%/51.4% versus 63.6%/18.4%/NE; p < 0.001). Median PFS (mPFS) and median OS (mOS) for the CPS-5 were 9.5 months/NE, and 5.1/14.0 months for the CPS-6 (both p < 0.001). Furthermore, for modified albumin-bilirubin grade (mALBI)-1/2a/2b, mPFS was 9.4/8.5/5.3 months (p < 0.001) and mOS was NE/17.8/13.4 months (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Better hepatic function, such as mALBI grade 1 or 2a are thought to indicate a better condition for obtaining sufficient prognosis with Atez/Bev treatment for u-HCC patients, whereas for CP-B patients, who mainly shown an mALBI grade of 2b or 3, Atez/Bev might have less therapeutic efficacy.
Keywords: Child-Pugh class B; atezolizumab plus bevacizumab; hepatocellular carcinoma; modified albumin-bilirubin grade; prognosis.
© 2022 The Authors. Hepatology Research published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Society of Hepatology.
Similar articles
-
Does first-line treatment have prognostic impact for unresectable HCC?-Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib.Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):325-334. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4854. Epub 2022 Jun 3. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 35666040 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison between Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Lenvatinib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Child-Pugh Class B in Real-World Clinical Settings.Oncology. 2023;101(9):542-552. doi: 10.1159/000530028. Epub 2023 Aug 8. Oncology. 2023. PMID: 37552968
-
Early experience of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma BCLC-B stage patients classified as beyond up to seven criteria - Multicenter analysis.Hepatol Res. 2022 Mar;52(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/hepr.13734. Epub 2021 Dec 2. Hepatol Res. 2022. PMID: 34799975
-
Clinical efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 9;102(23):e33852. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033852. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023. PMID: 37335628 Free PMC article.
-
Prognosis and treatment pattern of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of first-line atezolizumab and bevacizumab treatment.Hepatol Int. 2022 Oct;16(5):1199-1207. doi: 10.1007/s12072-022-10392-x. Epub 2022 Aug 20. Hepatol Int. 2022. PMID: 35986846 Review.
Cited by
-
Adverse events as potential predictive factors of therapeutic activity in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.Cancer Med. 2023 Apr;12(7):7772-7783. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5535. Epub 2022 Dec 14. Cancer Med. 2023. PMID: 36518086 Free PMC article.
-
Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: interim analysis results from the phase IIIb AMETHISTA trial.ESMO Open. 2025 Feb;10(2):104110. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104110. Epub 2025 Jan 27. ESMO Open. 2025. PMID: 39874903 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and Effect on Liver Functional Reserve of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients Who Do Not Meet Eligibility Criteria of IMbrave150.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Aug 15;14(16):3938. doi: 10.3390/cancers14163938. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 36010930 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with portal hypertension for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.Cancer Med. 2024 Mar;13(5):e7025. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7025. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 38477514 Free PMC article.
-
Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Real-life Experience from a Single Tertiary Centre in Spain and ALBI Score as a Survival Prognostic Factor.Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024 Sep 1;4(5):623-630. doi: 10.21873/cdp.10373. eCollection 2024 Sep-Oct. Cancer Diagn Progn. 2024. PMID: 39238615 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J Cancer. 2001;94(2):153-6. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.1440
-
- Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V, Hilgard P, Gane E, Blanc JF, et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(4):378-90. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0708857
-
- Finn RS, Qin S, Ikeda M, Galle PR, Ducreux M, Kim TY, et al. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(20):1894-905. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1915745
-
- Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S, Han KH, Ikeda K, Piscaglia F, et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10126):1163-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30207-1
-
- Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P, Granito A, Huang YH, Bodoky G, et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):56-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(16)32453-9
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous