Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;16(1):5-8.
doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000071. Epub 2021 Dec 16.

Comparison stone-free rate and effects on quality of life of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal pelvis stone (2-4 cm): A prospective controlled study

Affiliations

Comparison stone-free rate and effects on quality of life of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal pelvis stone (2-4 cm): A prospective controlled study

Oktay Ucer et al. Curr Urol. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of our study was to compare the effects on quality of life (QoL) and stone-free rate (SFR) of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in patients with renal stones 2-4cm.

Materials and methods: A total of 102 patients with renal pelvis stones were enrolled in this prospective controlled study, of which 52 were performed RIRS and 50 with PNL. The QoL was evaluated by using Short From-36 pre- and post-operatively. Also, the surgical data of all patients during and after the operations were compared between the 2 groups.

Results: The mean age, body mass index, stone size and density of the patients in the 2 groups were statistically similar (p > 0.05). The SFR of PNL and RIRS were found 94% (47/50) and 73% (38/52), respectively (p < 0.01). There were no statistically differences between operation times, minor complication rates and Short From-36 scores of the 2 groups. Hospitalization times were 1.13 ± 0.34days for RIRS and 2.9 ± 5.7days for PNL (p < 0.05). While the blood transfusion rate of PNL group was 8% (4/50), none patient was made blood transfusion in RIRS.

Conclusions: The results of our study show that the blood transfusion rates and hospitalization times of RIRS group are significantly lower than PNL for management of renal pelvis stone 2-4cm. Despite these advantages of RIRS, the SFR is significantly lower than PNL for these stones. The effects on QoL of the both interventions before and after surgery were similar.

Keywords: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Quality of life; Renal pelvis stone; Retrograde intrarenal surgery; Stone-free rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest to be stated for the corresponding author and all co-authors.

References

    1. Donaldson JF, Lardas M, Scrimgeour D, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones. Eur Urol 2015;67(4):612–616. - PubMed
    1. Türk C, Neisius A, Petrik A, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Tepeler A. Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology Congress, Copenhagen, March 16-20, 2018.
    1. Zengin K, Tanik S, Karakoyunlu N, et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous lithotripsy to treat renal stones 2-3 cm in diameter. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:914231. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koyuncu H, Yencilek F, Kalkan M, Bastug Y, Yencilek E, Ozdemir AT. Intrarenal surgery vs percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of lower pole stones greater than 2cm. Int Braz J Urol 2015;41(2): 245–251. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jung GH, Jung JH, Ahn TS, et al. Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lowerpole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30mm: A propensity score-matching study. Korean J Urol 2015;56(7):525–532. - PMC - PubMed