Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 10;9(2):307-315.
doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2022021. eCollection 2022.

Short time effects of a low-frequency, high intensity magnetic field in the treatment of chronic neck and low back pain

Affiliations

Short time effects of a low-frequency, high intensity magnetic field in the treatment of chronic neck and low back pain

Mattia Fortina et al. AIMS Public Health. .

Abstract

Introduction: Neck and back pain afflicts millions of people. Magnetotherapy has shown to have anti-inflammatory effects that could act on pain generation, but the literature lacks provide a precise therapeutic protocol.

Methods: A high-intensity electromagnetic field with a dedicated applicator was administered to 38 patients with low-back pain and 30 patients with neck pain. The device provides 60 mT and a frequency of 50 Hz for 30 minutes, the session was repeated 4 times.

Results: The mean VAS of the low-back pain group decreased from 6.56 to 4.54, with a significant reduction of 30.8%. The mean VAS of the neck pain group decreased from 6.51 to 1.96, with a significant reduction of 69.9%.

Discussion: The treatment used showed good results in both groups of the patient, without side effects. The therapeutic protocol adopted is safe, provide rapid relief from the pain and is not time demanding. This treatment could represent an effective non-pharmacologic physical therapy option in the treatment of low-back pain and cervical pain.

Keywords: PEMF; back pain; conservative treatment; magnetic-therapy; musculoskeletal disorders; neck pain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests: SC has interest unrelated to this work: he is an educational consultant for Zimmer-Biomet and the authors have also no other competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. The device applicator positioned on the low-back of a patient.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. The internal structure of the device.

References

    1. Manek NJ, McGregor AJ. Epidemiology of back disorders: prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis. Curr Opin Rheumatolo. 2005;17:134–140. doi: 10.1097/01.bor.0000154215.08986.06. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahidi B, Curran-Everett D, Maluf KS. Psychosocial, physical, and neurophysiological risk factors for chronic neck pain: a prospective inception cohort study. J Pain. 2015;16:1288–1299. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.09.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sihawong R, Sitthipornvorakul E, Paksaichol A, et al. Predictors for chronic neck and low back pain in office workers: a 1-year prospective cohort study. J Occup Health. 2016;58:16–24. doi: 10.1539/joh.15-0168-OA. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoy D, Bain C, Williams G, et al. A systematic review of the global prevalence of low back pain. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2028–2037. doi: 10.1002/art.34347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Garcia AN, Costa LC, da Silva TM, et al. Effectiveness of back school versus McKenzie exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2013;93:729–747. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20120414. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources