Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(4Part-II):987-991.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.4.4952.

Inter-rater reliability of pressure biofeedback unit among individuals with and without chronic low back pain

Affiliations

Inter-rater reliability of pressure biofeedback unit among individuals with and without chronic low back pain

Muhammad Khan et al. Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the inter-rater reliability of pressure biofeedback unit among individuals with and without chronic low back pain.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 2021 to March 2021 at the Physiotherapy Department of the Sindh Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Sixteen subjects which were recruited with and without chronic low back pain.(CLBP). During the test, abdominal drawing in movement was monitored by measuring a change in pressure detected in PBU. Each test was performed once by two trained assessors with period of seven days. Reliability indices of Pressure Biofeedback (PBU) measures including the Intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] and Band Altman plot were analyzed.

Results: This study found an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.94 [95% confidence interval (CI) (0.37, 0.99] for inter-rater reliability in healthy individuals, and an ICC of 0.97 (95% CI 0.97, 0.98) for inter-rater reliability in CLBP. The interrater agreement (Limits of Agreement-LOA=5.92, -3.9 mmHg) in CLBP and the interrater agreement (LOA=5.75, -3.25 mmHg) in healthy individuals were within the limits of agreement on 95% of occasions.

Conclusion: Pressure Biofeedback Unit has showed excellent inter-rater reliability in measuring Transverse Abdominis muscle activity for individuals with and without chronic LBP.

Keywords: Low back pain; Outcome Assessment; Pressure Biofeedback; Reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig.1
Fig.1
Bland-Altman limits of agreement analysis between two raters in CLBP.
Fig.2
Fig.2
Bland-Altman limits of agreement analysis between two raters in healthy population.

References

    1. Beyera GK, O'Brien J, Campbell S. Health-care utilisation for low back pain:a systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based observational studies. Rheumatol Int. 2019;39(10):1663–1679. doi:10.1007/s00296-019-04430-5. - PubMed
    1. Maher C, Underwood M, Buchbinder R. Non-specific low back pain. Lancet. 2017;389(10070):736–747. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30970-9. - PubMed
    1. Sung PS. Disability and back muscle fatigability changes following two therapeutic exercise interventions in participants with recurrent low back pain. Med Sci Monit. 2013;14(19):40–48. doi:10.12659/msm.883735. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Djordjevic O, Konstantinovic L, Miljkovic N, Bijelic G. Relationship between electromyographic signal amplitude and thickness change of the trunk muscles in patients with and without low back pain. Clin J Pain. 2015;31(10):893–902. doi:10.1097/AJP.0000000000000179. - PubMed
    1. Zheng Y, Ke S, Lin C, Li X, Liu C, Wu Y, et al. Effect of Core Stability Training Monitored by Rehabilitative Ultrasound Image and Surface Electromyogram in Local Core Muscles of Healthy People. Pain Res Manag. 2019;23 2019.9130959. doi:10.1155/2019/9130959. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources