Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;41(3):e257-e265.
doi: 10.1111/ajag.13095. Epub 2022 May 30.

Effectiveness of a co-designed technology package on perceptions of safety in community-dwelling older adults

Susan Gordon  1   2 , Fiona Telford-Sharp  2 , William Crowe  2 , Stephanie Champion  1
Affiliations

Effectiveness of a co-designed technology package on perceptions of safety in community-dwelling older adults

Susan Gordon et al. Australas J Ageing. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: Increasing numbers of older people are living longer, often alone, in their own homes. Services and products that enable older people to remain safely in their own homes are required. The My Smart Home project recruited 30 community-dwelling people aged 65+ to co-design a package of technology to address their individual goals for safety and security at home. The technology package, up to the value of $4000, included installation of health monitoring, communication and entertainment devices, and security alarms, with 6 hours of technology coaching.

Methods: Participants completed the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI), the Australian Quality of Life-8 Dimensions (AQoL-8D) and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) at baseline, and after 4 weeks' use of the technology package. Semi-structured interviews were also used to qualitatively understand the challenges, enablers and outcomes of the project with respect to safety and security in the home.

Results: Significant improvements in PWI (p < 0.01), AQoL-8D (p < 0.001) and COPM for goal performance (p < 0.001) and goal satisfaction (p < 0.001) were reported. Participants also reported feeling safer and more secure in their own homes. Common barriers to adoption of technology, cost, integration with already-owned technology and lack of confidence were overcome with this technology and coaching package.

Conclusions: An individualised package of technology, with coaching, that supports older people to realise their personal goals with technology resulted in improved well-being, quality of life and sense of safety and security in community-dwelling older people. Ultimately, this should support a longer and better quality of life at home.

Keywords: ageing in place; assistive technology; healthy ageing; independent living.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Rolls L, Seymour JE, Froggatt KA, Hanratty B. Older people living alone at the end of life in the UK: research and policy challenges. Palliat Med. 2011;25(6):650-657. doi:10.1177/0269216310373165
    1. Stones D, Gullifer J. ‘At home it's just so much easier to be yourself’: older adults' perceptions of ageing in place. Ageing Soc. 2016;36(3):449-481. doi:10.1017/S0144686X14001214
    1. Radford K, Oxlade D, Fitzgerald A, Vecchio N. Making intergenerational care a possibility in Australia: a review of the Australian legislation. J Intergenerational Relatsh. 2016;14(2):119-134. doi:10.1080/15350770.2016.1160732
    1. Cagle JG, Munn JC. Long-distance caregiving: a systematic review of the literature. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2012;55(8):682-707. doi:10.1080/01634372.2012.703763
    1. de Jonge DM, Jones A, Phillips R, Chung M. Understanding the essence of home: older people's experience of home in Australia. Occup Ther Int. 2011 Mar;18(1):39-47. doi:10.1002/oti.312

LinkOut - more resources