Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Sep:39:102931.
doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102931. Epub 2022 May 27.

Efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: A meta-analysis

Xin Li et al. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) treatment for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase were comprehensively searched for studies published up to April 19, 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), retrospective and prospective cohort studies that compared SML with any other intervention for chronic CSC were selected. The primary outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.3. Random-effect model was used for pooled analysis.

Results: Eleven studies including 834 eyes were included, with 428 eyes undergoing SML treatment and 406 eyes receiving other interventions. Pooled results showed no significant differences between SML and control with respect to BCVA, CMT, or complete resolution of subretinal fluid, while SML treatment was inferior to control in terms of subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) reduction [weighted mean difference (WMD)=44.75, 95% Cl, 14.31-75.20, P<0.05, I2=72%]. However, SML was not superior to photodynamic therapy with respect to SFCT (WMD=61.29, 95% Cl, 29.50-93.08, P<0.05, I2=56%), retinal sensitivity (WMD=-1.85, 95% Cl, -3.05--0.65, P<0.01, I2=0) or NEI-VFQ25 score (WMD=-2.44, 95% Cl, -4.72--0.16, P<0.05, I2=0). No serious side effects of SML treatment were observed.

Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that the clinical efficacy of SML therapy is similar to other treatment modalities for chronic CSC. However, because of the lack of serious side effects, SML may be the most promising alternative therapy for chronic CSC. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021 258837).

Keywords: Chronic central serous chorioretinopathy; Conventional laser; Meta-analysis; Photodynamic therapy; Subthreshold micro-pulse laser.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources