Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 30;12(5):e054989.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054989.

Developing and validating a prognostic prediction model for patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5 based on disease conditions and intervention methods: a retrospective cohort study in China

Affiliations

Developing and validating a prognostic prediction model for patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3-5 based on disease conditions and intervention methods: a retrospective cohort study in China

Min Zhang et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a nomogram model to predict chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 3-5 prognosis.

Design: A retrospective cohort study. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis to select the relevant predictors. To select the best model, we evaluated the prediction models' accuracy by concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). We evaluated the clinical utility by decision curve analysis.

Setting: Chronic Disease Management (CDM) Clinic in the Nephrology Department at the Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine.

Participants: Patients with CKD stages 3-5 in the derivation and validation cohorts were 459 and 326, respectively.

Primary outcome measure: Renal replacement therapy (haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, renal transplantation) or death.

Results: We built four models. Age, estimated glomerular filtration rate and urine protein constituted the most basic model A. Haemoglobin, serum uric acid, cardiovascular disease, primary disease, CDM adherence and predictors in model A constituted model B. Oral medications and predictors in model A constituted model C. All the predictors constituted model D. Model B performed well in both discrimination and calibration (C-index: derivation cohort: 0.881, validation cohort: 0.886). Compared with model A, model B showed significant improvement in the net reclassification and integrated discrimination (model A vs model B: NRI: 1 year: 0.339 (-0.011 to 0.672) and 2 years: 0.314 (0.079 to 0.574); IDI: 1 year: 0.066 (0.010 to 0.127), p<0.001 and 2 years: 0.063 (0.008 to 0.106), p<0.001). There was no significant improvement between NRI and IDI among models B, C and D. Therefore, we selected model B as the optimal model.

Conclusions: We constructed a prediction model to predict the prognosis of patients with CKD stages 3-5 in the first and second year. Applying this model to clinical practice may guide clinical decision-making. Also, this model needs to be externally validated in the future.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR1900024633 (http://www.chictr.org.cn).

Keywords: chronic renal failure; end stage renal failure; nephrology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calibration curves for model B. (A) Derivation cohort, 1 year; (B) derivation cohort, 2 years; (C) validation cohort, 1 year; (D) validation cohort, 2 years. The grey line represents the ideal line for a perfect match between predicted and observed likelihood of endpoint events. The dark line indicates the proposed nomogram’s performance.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Nomogram for model B. Primary disease: 1 indicates primary glomerular disease, 2 indicates secondary nephropathy, 3 indicates diabetic nephropathy, 4 indicates other nephropathy, 5 indicates unknown reason. Instructions: locate age on the corresponding axis. Draw a line straight down to the axis to calculate how many points toward the probability of not occurring endpoint events in the patients at different ages. Repeat the courses for eGFR, PRO, Hb, UA, cardiovascular disease, primary disease and CDM adherence. Add all points obtained from the previous steps, and locate the final summation on the total score axis. The probability of not occurring endpoint events corresponds to the summation score on the risk scale. CDM, chronic disease management; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; Hb, haemoglobin; PRO, urine protein; UA, serum uric acid.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Decision curve for model B. (A) Derivation cohort, 1 year; (B) derivation cohort, 2 years; (C) validation cohort, 1 year; (D) validation cohort, 2 years. The horizontal line represents the net benefit of offering no intervention, assuming that none of the patients with CKD stages 3–5 would occur endpoint events; the slash line shows the net benefit of offering interventions to all patients, assuming that all patients with CKD stages 3–5 would occur endpoint events; the dashed line represents the net benefit of offering interventions based on the predictive nomogram. CKD, chronic kidney disease.

References

    1. National Kidney Foundation . K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 2002;39:S1–266. - PubMed
    1. Drawz P, Rahman M. Chronic kidney disease. Ann Intern Med 2015;162:ITC1–16. 10.7326/AITC201506020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang L, Wang F, Wang L, et al. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease in China: a cross-sectional survey. Lancet 2012;379:815–22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60033-6 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ammirati AL. Chronic kidney disease. Rev Assoc Med Bras 2020;66:s03–9. 10.1590/1806-9282.66.s1.3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tangri N, Stevens LA, Griffith J, et al. A predictive model for progression of chronic kidney disease to kidney failure. JAMA 2011;305:1553–9. 10.1001/jama.2011.451 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types