Risk adjustment performance between NNIS index and NHSN model for postoperative colorectal surgical site infection: A retrospective cohort study
- PMID: 35637982
- PMCID: PMC9142714
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103715
Risk adjustment performance between NNIS index and NHSN model for postoperative colorectal surgical site infection: A retrospective cohort study
Abstract
Background: Risk stratifications to predict development of surgical site infections (SSI) are crucial methods before surgery. Hence, we aimed to compare the performance of risk adjustment between the former NNIS risk index and the new NHSN procedure-specific risk model for postoperative colorectal SSI.
Materials and methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Data of post-colorectal SSI, indicating the use of the NNIS risk index for SSI adjustment, were retrieved from the medical records. Data were taken from patients who underwent colorectal surgery procedures between January 2005 and December 2016. Additional information regarding emergency colorectal surgery was retrieved to fulfill the requirements for calculation of the risks for SSI; via the new model. The predictive performance between the two models was compared using the means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Results: In total 1989 patients were included. Fifteen patients were excluded; thus, the remaining number of procedures was 1974. Surgical site infections occurred in 85 (4.3%) procedures. In colectomy surgery, the means of area under the curve (AUC) yielded 0.6196 and 0.5976 for the NNIS risk index model and the new NHSN risk model, respectively; differences in the AUC were not statistically significant (p = 0.39). In rectal surgery, the means of the AUC yielded 0.516 and 0.49 for the NNIS risk index model and the new NHSN procedure-specific risk model, respectively; differences in the AUC were not statistically significant (p = 0.56).
Conclusion: The new NHSN procedure-specific risk model was not superior to the former NNIS risk index.
Keywords: Colorectal surgery; Risk stratification; Surgical site infection (SSI).
© 2022 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors of this article have certified that there were no financial, nor non-financial conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Smyth E.T., Emmerson A.M. Surgical site infection surveillance. J. Hosp. Infect. 2000;45:173–184. - PubMed
-
- Weiss C.A., 3rd, Statz C.L., Dahms R.A., Remucal M.J., Dunn D.L., Beilman G.J. Six years of surgical wound infection surveillance at a tertiary care center: review of the microbiologic and epidemiological aspects of 20,007 wounds. Arch. Surg. 1999;134:1041–1048. - PubMed
-
- Mangram A.J., Horan T.C., Pearson M.L., Silver L.C., Jarvis W.R., Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection Hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 1999;20:250–278. 1999. - PubMed
-
- Martone W.J., Nichols R.L. Recognition, prevention, surveillance, and management of surgical site infections: introduction to the problem and symposium overview. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001;33(Suppl 2):S67–S68. - PubMed
-
- Gaynes R.P., Culver D.H., Horan T.C., Edwards J.R., Richards C., Tolson J.S. Surgical site infection (SSI) rates in the United States, 1992–1998: the National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance System basic SSI risk index. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2001;33(Suppl 2):S69–S77. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
