Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;38(4):970-977.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07671-6. Epub 2022 May 31.

Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study

Ash B Alpert  1   2 , Jamie E Mehringer  3 , Sunshine J Orta  4 , Emile Redwood  5 , Tresne Hernandez  6 , Lexis Rivers  7 , Charlie Manzano  7 , Roman Ruddick  7 , Spencer Adams  8 , Catherine Cerulli  9   10 , Don Operario  11 , Jennifer J Griggs  12   13
Affiliations

Experiences of Transgender People Reviewing Their Electronic Health Records, a Qualitative Study

Ash B Alpert et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The 21st Century Cures Act and the OpenNotes movement have brought patients immediate access to their electronic health records (EHRs). The experiences of marginalized people, including transgender people, accessing and reviewing their EHRs could inform documentation guidelines to improve patient-clinician rapport and reduce harm.

Objective: To investigate the experiences of transgender people reviewing EHRs.

Design: Qualitative study using community-engaged research and an interpretive description methodology. Participants were recruited via social media, snowball sampling was employed, and purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity in terms of age, race/ethnicity, and other factors. In focus groups, participants were asked to discuss their experiences reviewing their EHRs and, for those participants who were clinicians, their experiences reviewing other clinicians' documentation.

Participants: Thirty transgender adults aged 20 to 67 years, including 10 clinicians.

Approach: Digital audio-recordings of focus groups were transcribed verbatim. Content was analyzed to identify emerging essential elements and analysis was continued until no new themes emerged (i.e., saturation).

Key results: Four themes were noted. (1) Using the wrong name, pronoun, or gender marker for patients is common in the EHR, erodes trust, and causes trauma. (2) Various aspects of clinicians' notes contradict, blame, or stigmatize patients, across multiple axes of oppression. (3) Limitations of EHR capabilities create barriers to quality care. (4) Certain medical customs set the stage for marginalizing, objectifying, and pathologizing transgender people.

Conclusions: Transgender people experience harm via various aspects of EHR documentation, suggesting that changes must be made to improve patient-clinician relationships and reduce ill-effects for patients.

Keywords: electronic health records; patient-clinician communication; qualitative research; social stigma; transgender persons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Zulman DM, Haverfield MC, Shaw JG, Brown-Johnson CG, Schwartz R, Tierney AA, et al. Practices to foster physician presence and connection with patients in the clinical encounter. JAMA. 2020;323(1):70-81. - PubMed
    1. OpenNotes. About OpenNotes. https://www.opennotes.org/about/.
    1. Bell SK, Mejilla R, Anselmo M, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Leveille S, et al. When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(4):262-70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sarabu C, Lee T, Hogan A, Pageler N. The value of opennotes for pediatric patients, their families and impact on the patient-physician relationship. Appl Clin Inform. 2021;12(1):76-81. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Park J, Saha S, Chee B, Taylor J, Beach MC. Physician use of stigmatizing language in patient medical records. JAMA Network Open. 2021;4(7):e2117052-e. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types