Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 1;22(2):269-283.

A review of musculoskeletal adaptations in individuals following major lower-limb amputation

Affiliations
Review

A review of musculoskeletal adaptations in individuals following major lower-limb amputation

M G Finco et al. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. .

Abstract

Structural musculoskeletal adaptations following amputation, such as bone mineral density (BMD) or muscle architecture, are often overlooked despite their established contributions to gait rehabilitation and the development of adverse secondary physical conditions. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the existing literature investigating musculoskeletal adaptations in individuals with major lower-limb amputations to inform clinical practice and provide directions for future research. Google Scholar, PubMed, and Scopus were searched for original peer-reviewed studies that included individuals with transtibial or transfemoral amputations. Summary data of twenty-seven articles indicated reduced BMD and increased muscle atrophy in amputees compared to controls, and in the amputated limb compared to intact and control limbs. Specifically, BMD was reduced in T-scores and Z-scores, femoral neck, and proximal tibia. Muscle atrophy was evidenced by decreased thigh cross-sectional area, decreased quadriceps thickness, and increased amounts of thigh fat. Overall, amputees have impaired musculoskeletal health. Future studies should include dysvascular etiologies to address their effects on musculoskeletal health and functional mobility. Moreover, clinicians can use these findings to screen increased risks of adverse sequelae such as fractures, osteopenia/porosis, and muscular atrophy, as well as target specific rehabilitation exercises to reduce these risks.

Keywords: Anatomy; Limb Loss; Physiology; Remodeling; Symmetry.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MG Finco was supported by the National Institutes of Health/National Institute on Aging (T32 AG020494) and the Institute for Healthy Aging. S. Kim was supported by Grant (# RP170301) from Cancer Prevention and Research Institutes of Texas. The remaining authors have nothing to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the inclusion process.

References

    1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States:2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(3):422–9. - PubMed
    1. Sherk VD, Bemben MG, Bemben DA. Interlimb muscle and fat comparisons in persons with lower-limb amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(7):1077–81. - PubMed
    1. Rubin CT, Lanyon LE. Regulation of bone formation by applied dynamic loads. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66(3):397–402. - PubMed
    1. Frost HM. Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage:an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 1994;64(3):175–88. - PubMed
    1. Gailey R, Allen K, Castles J, et al. Review of secondary physical conditions associated with lower-limb amputation and long-term prosthesis use. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45(1):15–29. - PubMed