Management of older patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope and bifascicular block: Implantable loop recorder versus empiric pacemaker implantation-Results of a propensity-matched analysis
- PMID: 35643299
- DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2022.05.023
Management of older patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope and bifascicular block: Implantable loop recorder versus empiric pacemaker implantation-Results of a propensity-matched analysis
Abstract
Background: In patients with unexplained syncope and bifascicular block (BFB), syncope may be caused by intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block. When a correlation between syncope and bradyarrhythmia is not documented in these patients, 2 alternative management strategies can be adopted: (1) empiric pacemaker (PM) implantation or (2) long-term continuous electrocardiographic monitoring by implantable loop recorder (ILR).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of syncope recurrence associated with empiric PM implantation or ILR monitoring.
Methods: A prospective, multicenter, observational study enrolled consecutive patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope and BFB who underwent ILR monitoring or empiric PM implantation. The risk and causes of syncope recurrence were assessed and compared between the 2 groups. Individual 1:1 propensity matching of baseline characteristics was performed.
Results: A total of 309 consecutive patients (age 77.2 ± 12.2 years; 60.8% male) were enrolled. Propensity matching yielded 89 matched pairs. After median follow-up of 33 months, empiric PM implantation was associated with a significantly lower risk of syncope recurrence than ILR monitoring (19.1 vs 46.1%; P <.001). A total of 35 patients (39.3%) who underwent ILR monitoring developed bradyarrhythmias (68.6% paroxysmal AV block) requiring PM implantation during follow-up. Excluding bradyarrhythmic syncope, the most frequent causes of syncope recurrence in both study groups were reflex syncope and orthostatic hypotension.
Conclusion: In patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope and BFB, empiric PM implantation significantly reduced the risk of syncope recurrence in comparison with ILR monitoring. A high rate of patients who underwent ILR monitoring developed bradyarrhythmias requiring PM implantation.
Keywords: Bifascicular block; Bradyarrhythmia; Empiric pacemaker implantation; Implantable loop recorder; Insertable cardiac monitor; Pacemaker; Traumatic syncope; Unexplained syncope.
Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Predictive factors for pacemaker implantation in patients receiving an implantable loop recorder for syncope remained unexplained after an extensive cardiac and neurological workup.Int J Cardiol. 2013 Oct 9;168(4):3450-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.04.179. Epub 2013 May 20. Int J Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 23701932
-
Usefulness of an Implantable Loop Recorder in Diagnosing Unexplained Syncope and Predictors for Pacemaker Implantation.J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Jan 13;35(2):e11. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e11. J Korean Med Sci. 2020. PMID: 31920017 Free PMC article.
-
Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as a predictor of pacemaker implantation in patients with unexplained syncope.J Cardiol. 2022 Jul;80(1):28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.02.017. Epub 2022 Mar 12. J Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35292196
-
Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Cardiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):e24221. doi: 10.1002/clc.24221. Clin Cardiol. 2024. PMID: 38402528 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients receiving implantable loop recorders for unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):1703-1710. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.038. Epub 2024 Mar 18. Heart Rhythm. 2024. PMID: 38508296
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical