Environmental RNA degrades more rapidly than environmental DNA across a broad range of pH conditions
- PMID: 35643953
- DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13655
Environmental RNA degrades more rapidly than environmental DNA across a broad range of pH conditions
Abstract
Although the use and development of molecular biomonitoring tools based on environmental nucleic acids (eDNA and eRNA; collectively known as eNAs) have gained broad interest for the quantification of biodiversity in natural ecosystems, studies investigating the impact of site-specific physicochemical parameters on eNA-based detection methods (particularly eRNA) remain scarce. Here, we used a controlled laboratory microcosm experiment to comparatively assess the environmental degradation of eDNA and eRNA across an acid-base gradient following complete removal of the progenitor organism (Daphnia pulex). Using water samples collected over a 30-day period, eDNA and eRNA copy numbers were quantified using a droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) assay targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of D. pulex. We found that eRNA decayed more rapidly than eDNA at all pH conditions tested, with detectability-predicted by an exponential decay model-for up to 57 h (eRNA; neutral pH) and 143 days (eDNA; acidic pH) post organismal removal. Decay rates for eDNA were significantly higher in neutral and alkaline conditions than in acidic conditions, while decay rates for eRNA did not differ significantly among pH levels. Collectively, our findings provide the basis for a predictive framework assessing the persistence and degradation dynamics of eRNA and eDNA across a range of ecologically relevant pH conditions, establish the potential for eRNA to be used in spatially and temporally sensitive biomonitoring studies (as it is detectable across a range of pH levels), and may be used to inform future sampling strategies in aquatic habitats.
Keywords: biomonitoring; droplet digital PCR; eDNA; eRNA; nucleic acid degradation.
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Allan, J., Castillo, M., & Capps, K. (2021). Stream ecology: Structure and function of running waters. Springer International Publishing.
-
- Arnhold, E. (2017). Easynls: Easy nonlinear model (5.0) [computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=easynls
-
- Barnes, M. A., Turner, C. R., Jerde, C. L., Renshaw, M. A., Chadderton, W. L., & Lodge, D. M. (2014). Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(3), 1819-1827. https://doi.org/10.1021/es404734p
-
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
-
- Bernhardt, H. S., & Tate, W. P. (2012). Primordial soup or vinaigrette: Did the RNA world evolve at acidic pH? Biology Direct, 7(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6150-7-4
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources