Adverse pregnancy outcomes: biological essentialism versus embodied biology - Authors' reply

Affiliations

¹ Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London SE1 1SZ, UK; Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: jennifer.jardine@lshtm.ac.uk.
² Centre for Reproduction Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
³ Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Hospital, London, UK; Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
⁴ Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Comment

Jennifer Jardine et al. Lancet. 2022.

. 2022 May 28;399(10340):2014.

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00171-4.

¹ Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London SE1 1SZ, UK; Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Electronic address: jennifer.jardine@lshtm.ac.uk.
² Centre for Reproduction Research, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.
³ Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's Hospital, London, UK; Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.
⁴ Department of Health Services Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

No abstract available

Comment on

Adverse pregnancy outcomes: biological essentialism versus embodied biology.
Ravi K, Janiak E. Ravi K, et al. Lancet. 2022 May 28;399(10340):2013-2014. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00165-9. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 35644151 No abstract available.