Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Jul:138:104709.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104709. Epub 2022 May 26.

Evoking stress reactivity in virtual reality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lotte van Dammen  1 , Tor T Finseth  2 , Bethany H McCurdy  1 , Neil P Barnett  1 , Roselynn A Conrady  1 , Alexis G Leach  1 , Andrew F Deick  1 , Allissa L Van Steenis  1 , Reece Gardner  1 , Brandon L Smith  1 , Anita Kay  1 , Elizabeth A Shirtcliff  1
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Evoking stress reactivity in virtual reality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lotte van Dammen et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Virtual reality (VR) research probes stress environments that are infeasible to create in the real world. However, because research simulations are applied to narrow populations, it remains unclear if VR simulations can stimulate a broadly applicable stress-response. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on studies using VR stress tasks and biomarkers.

Methods: Included papers (N = 52) measured cortisol, heart rate (HR), galvanic skin response (GSR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA), parasympathetic activity (RMSSD), sympathovagal balance (LF/HF), and/or salivary alpha-amylase (sAA). Effect sizes (ES) and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated based on standardized mean change of baseline-to-peak biomarker levels.

Results: From baseline-to-peak (ES, CI), analyses showed a statistically significant change in cortisol (0.56, 0.28-0.83), HR (0.68, 0.53-0.82), GSR (0.59, 0.36-0.82), SBP (.55, 0.19-0.90), DBP (.64, 0.23-1.05), RSA (-0.59, -0.88 to -0.30), and sAA (0.27, 0.092-0.45). There was no effect for RMSSD and LF/HF.

Conclusion: VR stress tasks elicited a varied magnitude of physiological stress reactivity. VR may be an effective tool in stress research.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Psychosocial stress; Stress; Stress Test; Stress reactivity; Virtual Reality.

PubMed Disclaimer