Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 May 6;8(2):31.
doi: 10.3390/ijns8020031.

Towards Achieving Equity and Innovation in Newborn Screening across Europe

Affiliations
Review

Towards Achieving Equity and Innovation in Newborn Screening across Europe

Jaka Sikonja et al. Int J Neonatal Screen. .

Abstract

Although individual rare disorders are uncommon, it is estimated that, together, 6000+ known rare diseases affect more than 30 million people in Europe, and present a substantial public health burden. Together with the psychosocial burden on affected families, rare disorders frequently, if untreated, result in a low quality of life, disability and even premature death. Newborn screening (NBS) has the potential to detect a number of rare conditions in asymptomatic children, providing the possibility of early treatment and a significantly improved long-term outcome. Despite these clear benefits, the availability and conduct of NBS programmes varies considerably across Europe and, with the increasing potential of genomic testing, it is likely that these differences may become even more pronounced. To help improve the equity of provision of NBS and ensure that all children can be offered high-quality screening regardless of race, nationality and socio-economic status, a technical meeting, endorsed by the Slovenian Presidency of the Council of the European Union, was held in October 2021. In this article, we present experiences from individual EU countries, stakeholder initiatives and the meeting's final conclusions, which can help countries attempting to establish new NBS programmes or expand existing provision.

Keywords: Europe; NBS; Slovenia; access inequality; meeting; newborn screening; rare diseases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

    1. Chace D.H., Kalas T.A., Naylor E.W. Use of Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Multianalyte Screening of Dried Blood Specimens from Newborns. Clin. Chem. 2003;49:1797–1817. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.022178. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann G.F., Lindner M., Loeber J.G. 50 years of newborn screening. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2014;37:163–164. doi: 10.1007/s10545-014-9688-5. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groselj U., Tansek M.Z., Battelino T. Fifty years of phenylketonuria newborn screening—A great success for many, but what about the rest? Mol. Genet. Metab. 2014;113:8–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2014.07.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moliner A.M., Waligora J. The European Union Policy in the Field of Rare Diseases. Rare Diseases Epidemiology: Update and Overview. In: Posada de la Paz M., Taruscio D., Groft S.C., editors. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Volume 1031. Springer Nature; Basingstoke, UK: 2017. pp. 561–587. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nguengang Wakap S., Lambert D.M., Olry A., Rodwell C., Gueydan C., Lanneau V., Murphy D., Le Cam Y., Rath A. Estimating cumulative point prevalence of rare diseases: Analysis of the Orphanet database. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2020;28:165–173. doi: 10.1038/s41431-019-0508-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed