Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022;21(6):1887-1911.
doi: 10.1007/s11101-022-09816-1. Epub 2022 May 24.

Propolis: chemical diversity and challenges in quality control

Affiliations
Review

Propolis: chemical diversity and challenges in quality control

Deepak Kasote et al. Phytochem Rev. 2022.

Abstract

Propolis is a resinous natural product produced by honeybees using beeswax and plant exudates. The chemical composition of propolis is highly complex, and varies with region and season. This inherent chemical variability presents several challenges to its standardisation and quality control. The present review was aimed at highlighting marker compounds for different types of propolis, produced by the species Apis mellifera, from different geographical origins and that display different biological activities, and to discuss strategies for quality control. Over 800 compounds have been reported in the different propolises such as temperate, tropical, birch, Mediterranean, and Pacific propolis; these mainly include alcohols, acids and their esters, benzofuranes, benzopyranes, chalcones, flavonoids and their esters, glycosides (flavonoid and diterpene), glycerol and its esters, lignans, phenylpropanoids, steroids, terpenes and terpenoids. Among these, flavonoids (> 140), terpenes and terpenoids (> 160) were major components. A broad range of biological activities, such as anti-oxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and anticancer activities, have been ascribed to propolis constituents, as well as the potential of these compounds to be biomarkers. Several analytical techniques, including non-separation and separation methods have been described in the literature for the quality control assessment of propolis. Mass spectrometry coupled with separation methods, followed by chemometric analysis of the data, was found to be a valuable tool for the profiling and classification of propolis samples, including (bio)marker identification. Due to the rampant chemotypic variability, a multiple-marker assessment strategy considering geographical and biological activity marker(s) with chemometric analysis may be a promising approach for propolis quality assessment.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11101-022-09816-1.

Keywords: Marker compounds; Phytochemistry; Propolis; Quality control; Standardisation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Structures of different classes and sub-classes of flavonoids reported in propolis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Terpenes and terpenoids reported in propolis
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Global classification of common propolis types based on chemical composition from different geographical zones. Adapted from Salatino et al. (2011)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Polyprenylated benzophenones and lignans characteristic of tropical region propolis
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Types of phenylpropanoids reported in Brazilian propolis
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Heat map showing chemical composition variation within propolis samples studied from different countries of world. The yellow colouring indicates the presence, and the brown colouring, the absence, of specified compound classes. Temperate and subtropical climatic zone countries reflect a similar chemical composition. However, no distinct chemical composition is evident within tropical and subtropical climatic zone countries. (Color figure online)

References

    1. Abd El Hady FK, Hegazi AG. Egyptian propolis: 2. Chemical composition, antiviral and antimicrobial activities of East Nile Delta propolis. Z Nat C. 2002;57(3–4):386–394. doi: 10.1515/znc-2002-3-431. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abu-Mellal A, Koolaji N, Duke RK, Tran VH, Duke CC. Prenylated cinnamate and stilbenes from Kangaroo Island propolis and their antioxidant activity. Phytochemistry. 2012;77:251–259. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.01.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adewumi A, Ogunjinmi A. The healing potential of honey and propolis lotion on septic wounds. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2011;1(1):S55–S57. doi: 10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60123-8. - DOI
    1. Agüero MaBn, Gonzalez M, Lima B, Svetaz L, Sanchez M, Zacchino S, et al. Argentinean propolis from Zuccagnia punctata Cav. (Caesalpinieae) exudates: phytochemical characterization and antifungal activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(1):194–201. doi: 10.1021/jf902991t. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Agüero MB, Svetaz L, Sánchez M, Luna L, Lima B, López ML, et al. Argentinean Andean propolis associated with the medicinal plant Larrea nitida Cav. (Zygophyllaceae). HPLC–MS and GC–MS characterization and antifungal activity. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49(9):1970–1978. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.05.008. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources