Static vs. dynamic navigation for endodontic microsurgery - A comparative review
- PMID: 35646551
- PMCID: PMC9136095
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2022.04.010
Static vs. dynamic navigation for endodontic microsurgery - A comparative review
Erratum in
-
Erratum regarding missing declaration of competing interest statements in previously published articles.J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024 Jul-Aug;14(4):358-359. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.05.010. Epub 2024 May 22. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2024. PMID: 38826840 Free PMC article.
Abstract
Digitalization of operative procedures through three-dimensional (3D) navigation is a remarkable advancement in the field of dentistry which allows both precision and accuracy while treating patients. It is an emerging technology with a wide variety of applications in dentistry. In the field of endodontics, these computer-aided 3D systems are being used for accessing and localizing canals in calcified teeth, removal of fiberglass posts, and in peri-apical surgeries etc. Preservation of important anatomical structures becomes necessary while performing root-end resection or peri-apical surgeries. However, it is clinically difficult to achieve accurate root-end resection due to the limited field of view, inconvenient perspective, and interferential bleeding among other factors. 3D guided endodontics play vital role here. 3D guided endodontics can be achieved in two ways- Static and Dynamic navigation. Due to availability of limited literature, there is a need to review new evidence comparing the effectiveness of both techniques of 3D guided endodontic navigation systems. This review paper describes the comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of static as well as dynamic navigation in the field of endodontic microsurgery.
Keywords: 3D printing; Dynamic navigation; Endodontic microsurgery; Static guidance; Targeted endodontics.
© 2022 Craniofacial Research Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Masri R., Driscoll C.F. Clinical applications of digital dental technology [Internet] 2015. http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S97... [cited 2021 Mar 7]. Available from:
-
- Shah P., Chong B.S. 3D imaging, 3D printing and 3D virtual planning in endodontics. Clin Oral Invest. 2018 Mar 1;22(2):641–654. - PubMed
-
- Peng L., Zhao J., Wang Z.-H., Sun Y.-C., Liang Y.-H. Accuracy of root-end resection using a digital guide in endodontic surgery: an in vitro study. J Dent Sci [Internet] 2020 Aug 16;16(1):45–50. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.024. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1991790220301495 [cited 2020 Dec 20]; Available from: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Retrospective Evaluation of Surgical Endodontic Treatment: Traditional versus modern technique - J Endod [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 20]. Available from: https://www.jendodon.com/article/S0099-2399(05)00095-6/fulltext. - PubMed
-
- Kinariwala N., Samaranayake L.P., editors. Springer International Publishing; 2021. Guided endodontics [Internet]https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030552800 [cited 2021 Jun 13]. Available from:
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources