Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 11:9:842828.
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.842828. eCollection 2022.

Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel/Cisplatin/Capecitabine Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study

Affiliations

Neoadjuvant Bevacizumab Plus Docetaxel/Cisplatin/Capecitabine Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients: A Pilot Study

Deguo Yu et al. Front Surg. .

Abstract

Background: Bevacizumab (BEV) plus chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen presents good efficacy in patients with locally advanced cancer. However, its role in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is not clear. Thus, the study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant BEV plus chemotherapy in patients with LAGC.

Methods: Twenty resectable patients with LAGC who received BEV plus docetaxel/cisplatin/capecitabine (DCC) chemotherapy for 3 cycles with 21 days as one cycle as neoadjuvant regimen were involved. Besides, their treatment response, survival profiles, and adverse events were assessed.

Results: In total, two (10.0%), 9 (45.0%), 8 (40.0%), and 1 (5.0%) patients achieved complete remission, partial remission, stable disease, and progressive disease (PD) according to imaging evaluation, which resulted in 55.0% of objective response rate and 95.0% of disease control rate, respectively. Moreover, the number of patients with pathological response grades 1, 2, and 3 was 8 (40.0%), 8 (40.0%), and 3 (15.0%); while 1 (5.0%) patient did not receive surgery due to PD, thus the data of this patient was not assessable. Meanwhile, 18 (90.0%) patients achieved R0 resection. Regarding survival profile, the median disease-free survival or overall survival were both not reached. The 1-year, 2-, and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 88.8, 80.7, and 67.3%. Meanwhile, the 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 100.0%, 75.8%, and 75.8%, respectively. Additionally, the main adverse events were anemia (90.0%), alopecia (90.0%), leukopenia (70.0%), and anorexia (65.0%). Indeed, most adverse events were of grade 1 or 2 and were manageable.

Conclusion: Neoadjuvant BEV plus DCC chemotherapy presents a favorable pathological response and survival profile with acceptable safety in patients with LAGC.

Keywords: Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy; adverse events; neoadjuvant regimen; survival data; treatment response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Clinical response. The percentage of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) with complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) (A); the percentage of LAGC patients with objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) (B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Pathological response and R0 resection. The percentage of patients with LAGC with grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 pathological response (A); the percentage of patients with LAGC with R0 resection and without R0 resection (B).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival profile. Accumulating DFS rate (A) and accumulating OS rate (B). Dotted line represents the 95% CI of DFS or OS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Machlowska J, Baj J, Sitarz M, Maciejewski R, Sitarz R. Gastric Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification, Genomic Characteristics and Treatment Strategies. Int J Mol Sci. (2020) 21:4012. 10.3390/ijms21114012 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Strong VE. Progress in gastric cancer. Updates Surg. (2018) 70:157–59. 10.1007/s13304-018-0543-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiao S, Zhou L. Gastric cancer: Metabolic and metabolomics perspectives (Review). Int J Oncol. (2017) 51:5–17. 10.3892/ijo.2017.4000 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yang X, Zhang T, Zhang H, Sang S, Chen H, Zuo X. Temporal trend of gastric cancer burden along with its risk factors in China from 1990 to 2019, and projections until 2030: comparison with Japan, South Korea, and Mongolia. Biomark Res. (2021) 9:84. 10.1186/s40364-021-00340-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashimoto T, Kurokawa Y, Mori M, Doki Y. Update on the treatment of gastric cancer. JMA J. (2018) 1:40–9. 10.31662/jmaj.2018-0006 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources