Sex differences in outcome after thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. A propensity score-matched study
- PMID: 35647312
- PMCID: PMC9134778
- DOI: 10.1177/23969873221091648
Sex differences in outcome after thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. A propensity score-matched study
Abstract
Background and purpose: We sought to investigate whether there are gender differences in clinical outcome after stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) after mechanical thrombectomy (EVT) in a large population of real-world patients.
Methods: From the Italian Registry of Endovascular Thrombectomy, we extracted clinical and outcome data of patients treated for stroke due to large vessel occlusion. We compared clinical and safety outcomes in men and women who underwent EVT alone or in combination with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in the total population and in a Propensity Score matched set.
Results: Among 3422 patients included in the study, 1801 (52.6%) were women. Despite older age at onset (mean 72.4 vs 68.7; p < 0.001), and higher rate of atrial fibrillation (41.7% vs 28.6%; p < 0.001), women had higher probability of 3-month functional independence (adjusted odds ratio-adjOR 1.19; 95% CI 1.02-1.38), of complete recanalization (adjOR 1.25; 95% CI 1.09-1.44) and lower probability of death (adjOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.62-0.90). After propensity-score matching, a well-balanced cohort comprising 1150 men and 1150 women was analyzed, confirming the same results regarding functional outcome (3-month functional independence: OR 1.25; 95% CI 1.04-1.51), and complete recanalization (OR 1.29; 95% CI 1.09-1.53).
Conclusions: Subject to the limitations of a non-randomized comparison, women with stroke due to LVO treated with mechanical thrombectomy had a better chance to achieve complete recanalization, and 3-month functional independence than men. The results could be driven by women who underwent combined treatment.
Keywords: Ischemic stroke; sex; thrombectomy.
© European Stroke Organisation 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of conflicting interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: MB: Consultant for Penumbra Inc., Stryker Italia; AS: Consultant for Stryker; ADV: Consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, Daichi Sankyo; AZ: speaker fees and consulting fees from Boehringer-Ingelheim, Medtronic, Cerenovus and advisory board from Daiichi Sankyo and Boehringer-Ingelheim and Stryker; MC: speaker fees and consulting fees from Daiichi Sankyo and Bristol Myers Squibb, advisory board from Boehringer-Ingelheim; NPN: Consultant for Penumbra Inc., Acandis GmbH; SS: personal fees and non-financial support from Allergan, Abbott, Eli Lilly, Novartis, TEVA, participation to Advisory Board for Astra Zeneca, and research support from Laborest; AM: Consultant for Boehringer Ingelheim, DR: Proctor for Penumbra. Other Authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Figures


References
-
- Bousser MG. Stroke in women: the 1997 Paul Dudley White International Lecture. Circulation 1999; 99: 463–467. - PubMed
-
- Di Carlo A, Lamassa M, Baldereschi M, et al.; European BIOMED Study of Stroke Care Group. Sex differences in the clinical presentation, resource use, and 3-Month outcome of acute stroke in Europe. Stroke 2003; 34: 1114–1119. - PubMed
-
- Appelros P, Stegmayr B, Terént A. Sex differences in stroke epidemiology: a systematic review. Stroke 2009; 40: 1082–1090. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources