Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 20;8(5):e09469.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09469. eCollection 2022 May.

The effect of prior knowledge of color on reaction time depends on visual modality

Affiliations

The effect of prior knowledge of color on reaction time depends on visual modality

Takayuki Horinouchi et al. Heliyon. .

Abstract

Prior knowledge of color, such as traffic rules (blue/green and red mean "go" and "stop" respectively), can influence reaction times (RTs). Specifically, in a Go/No-go task, where signals were presented by a light-emitting diode (LED) lighting device, RT has been reported to be longer when responding to a red signal and withholding the response to a blue signal (Red Go/Blue No-go task) than when responding to a blue signal and withholding the response to a red signal (Blue Go/Red No-go task). In recent years, a driving simulator has been shown to be effective in evaluation and training of driving skills of dementia and stroke patients. However, it is unknown whether the change in RT observed with the LED lighting device can be replicated with a monitor presenting signals that are different from the real traffic lights in terms of depth and texture. The purpose of this study was to elucidate whether a difference in visual modality (LED and monitor) influences the effect of prior knowledge of color on RTs. Fifteen participants performed a simple reaction task (Blue and Red signals), a Blue Go/Red No-go task, and a Red Go/Blue No-go task. Signals were presented from an LED lighting device (Light condition) and a liquid crystal display (LCD) monitor (Monitor condition). The results showed that there was no significant difference in simple RT by signal color in both conditions. In the Go/No-go task, there was a significant interaction between the type of signal presentation device and the color of signal. Although the RT was significantly longer in the Red Go/Blue No-go than Blue Go/Red No-go task in the Light condition, there was no significant difference in RT between the Blue Go/Red No-go and Red Go/Blue No-go tasks in the Monitor condition. It is interpreted that blue and red signals presented from the LCD monitor were insufficient to evoke a perception of traffic lights as compared to the LED. This study suggests that a difference in the presentation modality (LED and monitor) of visual information can influence the level of object perception and consequently the effect of prior knowledge on behavioral responses.

Keywords: Go/No-go task; Prior knowledge of color; Reaction time; Visual modality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic illustration of the experiment. The subject sat on a chair and performed a simple reaction task and a Go/No-go task with the right hand in the Light and Monitor conditions.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reaction times in the simple reaction task. Individual data from all participants are presented for each condition. The black and white circles indicate the average. There was no significant difference between Blue and Red in both conditions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Reaction times in the Go/No-go task. Individual data from all participants are presented for each condition. The black and white circles indicate the average. The average reaction time was significantly longer in the Red Go/Blue No-go (Red Go) than Blue Go/Red No-go (Blue Go) task in the Light condition, but not in the Monitor condition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Iacoboni M. Visuo-motor integration and control in the human posterior parietal cortex: evidence from TMS and fMRI. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44:2691–2699. - PubMed
    1. Caylak E. The studies about phonological deficit theory in children with developmental dyslexia: review. Am. J. Neurosci. 2010;1:1–12.
    1. Yotani K., Tamaki H., Yuki A., Kirimoto H., Kitada K., Ogita F., Takekura H. Response training shortens visuo-motor related time in athletes. Int. J. Sports Med. 2011;32:586–590. - PubMed
    1. Kida N., Oda S., Matsumura M. Intensive baseball practice improves the Go/Nogo reaction time, but not the simple reaction time. Cognit. Brain Res. 2005;22:257–264. - PubMed
    1. Jodo E., Kayama Y. Relation of a negative ERP component to response inhibition in a Go/No-go task. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1992;82:477–482. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources