Minimal Clinically Important Changes in HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 Scores Following Joint Replacement
- PMID: 35648064
- DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00741
Minimal Clinically Important Changes in HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 Scores Following Joint Replacement
Abstract
Background: For patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to provide meaningful information to support clinical care, we need to understand the magnitude of change that matters to patients. The aim of this study was to estimate minimal clinically important changes (MCICs) for the 12-item Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) among people undergoing joint replacement for osteoarthritis.
Methods: Individual-level data from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry's pilot PROMs program were used for this analysis. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 domain and summary impact scores plus a rating of patient-perceived change after surgery (on a 5-point scale ranging from "much worse" to "much better") were available. Three anchor-based approaches-mean change, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) based on Youden's J statistic, and predictive modeling using a binary logistic regression model-were used to calculate MCICs based on patient-perceived change.
Results: Data were available for 1,490 patients treated with total hip replacement (THR) (mean age, 66 years; 54% female) and 1,931 patients treated with total knee replacement (TKR) (mean age, 66 years; 55% female). Using the mean change method, the MCIC ranged from 24.0 to 27.5 points for the HOOS-12 and 17.5 to 21.8 points for the KOOS-12. The ROC analyses generated comparable MCIC values (28.1 for HOOS-12 and a range of 15.6 to 21.9 for KOOS-12) with high sensitivity and specificity. Lower estimates were derived from predictive modeling following adjustment for the proportion of improved patients (range, 15.7 to 19.2 for HOOS-12 and 14.2 to 16.5 for KOOS-12).
Conclusions: We report MCIC values for the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments that we derived using 3 different methods. As estimates obtained using predictive modeling can be adjusted for the proportion of improved patients, these may be the most clinically applicable. These MCIC values can be used to interpret important changes in pain, function, and quality of life from the patient's perspective.
Levels of evidence: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2022 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: The Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest forms are provided with the online version of the article (http://links.lww.com/JBJS/G947).
References
-
- Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM.Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)—validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10.
-
- Roos EM, Lohmander LS. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 Nov 3;1:64.
-
- Gandek B, Roos EM, Franklin PD, Ware JE Jr. A 12-item short form of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 May;27(5):762-70.
-
- Gandek B, Roos EM, Franklin PD, Ware JE Jr. A 12-item short form of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12): tests of reliability, validity and responsiveness. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 May;27(5):754-61.
-
- Ackerman IN, Soh SE, Harris IA, Cashman K, Heath E, Lorimer M, Graves SE. Performance of the HOOS-12 and KOOS-12 instruments for evaluating outcomes from joint replacement surgery. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021 Jun;29(6):815-23.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
