Letter to the editor: absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 35648183
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-022-05247-w
Letter to the editor: absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial
Comment on
-
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Feb;33(2):411-419. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-04853-4. Epub 2021 Jun 8. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 34100975 Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Reisenauer C, Andress J, Schoenfisch B, et al. Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for vaginal mesh attachment during sacrocolpopexy: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2022;33:411–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-021-04853-4 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Abdullah B, Nomura J, Moriyama S, Huang T, Tokiwa S, Togo M. Clinical and urodynamic assessment in patients with pelvic organ prolapse before and after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2017;28(10):1543–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-017-3306-7 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ker C-R, Lin K-L, Loo Z-X, Juan Y-S, Long C-Y. Comparison of Uphold™ vaginal mesh procedure with hysterectomy or uterine preservation for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):9438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27765-8 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical