Automatic Detection of Meniscus Tears Using Backbone Convolutional Neural Networks on Knee MRI
- PMID: 35648374
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28284
Automatic Detection of Meniscus Tears Using Backbone Convolutional Neural Networks on Knee MRI
Abstract
Background: Timely diagnosis of meniscus injuries is key for preventing knee joint dysfunction and improving patient outcomes because it decreases morbidity and facilitates treatment planning.
Purpose: To train and evaluate a deep learning model for automated detection of meniscus tears on knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Study type: Bicentric retrospective study.
Subjects: In total, 584 knee MRI studies, divided among training (n = 234), testing (n = 200), and external validation (n = 150) data sets, were used in this study. The public data set MRNet was used as a second external validation data set to evaluate the performance of the model.
Sequence: A 3 T, coronal, and sagittal images from T1-weighted proton density (PD) fast spin-echo (FSE) with fat saturation and T2-weighted FSE with fat saturation sequences.
Assessment: The detection system for meniscus tear was based on the improved YOLOv4 model with Darknet-53 as the backbone. The performance of the model was also compared with that of three radiologists of varying levels of experience. The determination of the presence of a meniscus tear from surgery reports was used as the ground truth for the images.
Statistical tests: Sensitivity, specificity, prevalence, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the performance of the detection model. Two-way analysis of variance, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Tukey's multiple tests were used to evaluate differences in performance between the model and radiologists.
Results: The overall accuracies for detecting meniscus tears using our model on the internal testing, internal validation, and external validation data sets were 95.4%, 95.8%, and 78.8%, respectively. One radiologist had significantly lower performance than our model in detecting meniscal tears (accuracy: 0.9025 ± 0.093 vs. 0.9580 ± 0.025).
Data conclusion: The proposed model had high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting meniscus tears on knee MRIs.
Evidence level: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.
Keywords: Darknet53; YOLOv4; knee MR image; meniscus tear; object detection.
© 2022 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Comment in
-
Editorial for "Automatic Detection of Meniscus Tears Using Backbone Convolutional Neural Networks on Knee MRI".J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Mar;57(3):750-751. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28283. Epub 2022 Jun 2. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023. PMID: 35652382 No abstract available.
References
-
- Ni Y, Gao Y, Yao J. Introduction to musculoskeletal system. Biomechanical modelling and simulation on musculoskeletal system: Springer; Singapore; 2021. p 1-34.
-
- Ahmed I, Khatri C, Parsons N, et al. Meniscal tear outcome (METRO) review: A protocol for a systematic review summarising the clinical course and patient experiences of meniscal tears in the current literature. BMJ Open 2020;10(8):e036247.
-
- Favero M, Ramonda R, Goldring MB, Goldring SR, Punzi L. Early knee osteoarthritis. RMD Open 2015;1(Suppl 1):e000062.
-
- Lohmander LS, Englund PM, Dahl LL, Roos EM. The long-term consequence of anterior cruciate ligament and meniscus injuries: Osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med 2007;35(10):1756-1769.
-
- Teh WC, Shihabudin MT. Accuracy of McMurray's test, the modified version, and joint-line tenderness in diagnosing chronic meniscal tear in the knee joint: A cross-sectional study. Curr Orthop Pract 2020;31(1):13-17.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
