Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jan;33(1):16-29.
doi: 10.1080/10503307.2022.2079439. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

Renegotiating tasks or goals as rupture repair: A task analysis in a cognitive-behavioral therapy for personality disorder

J Christopher Muran  1 , Catherine F Eubanks  2 , Lauren M Lipner  1 , Sarah Bloch-Elkouby  3
Affiliations

Renegotiating tasks or goals as rupture repair: A task analysis in a cognitive-behavioral therapy for personality disorder

J Christopher Muran et al. Psychother Res. 2023 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to provide some definition of rupture repair in a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for personality disorders, specifically how treatment tasks or goals are renegotiated.

Method: Following a task analysis, a rational model was developed with the support of an expert panel. An empirical analysis was conducted on six CBT cases sampled from a clinical trial that included personality disordered patients and treatment adherent therapists. Two sessions from each case indicating rupture repair were selected, based on patient and therapist ratings of the Working Alliance Inventory-12 item version (WAI-12) and rupture presence. A qualitative analysis of the sessions was conducted with the support of the observer-based Rupture Resolution Rating System (3RS-2022).

Results: The empirical analysis provided some support for many of the stages defined in the rational model, but less support for the hypothesized sequences of stages. A rational-empirical synthesis yielded a revised model that suggested therapists combine various strategies in rupture repair in a variety of ways, not necessarily in consistent sequences.

Conclusions: The renegotiation of tasks and goals in this CBT sample was variable. The importance of responsiveness and the need to validate the rational-empirical model were highlighted.

Keywords: alliance; change process; rupture repair; task analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
A rational stage-process model regarding renegotiating tasks/goals
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
A rational-empirical stage-process model regarding renegotiating tasks/goals
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agnew RM, Harper H, Shapiro DA, & Barkham M (1994). Resolving a challenge to the therapeutic relationship: A single-case study. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 67, 155–170. - PubMed
    1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th edition). Author.
    1. Aspland H, Llewyn S, Hardy GE, Barkham M, & Stiles W (2008). Alliance ruptures and rupture resolution in cognitive-behavior therapy: A preliminary task analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 699–710. - PubMed
    1. Bakan D (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man. Beacon.
    1. Barber JP (2009). Toward a working through of some core conflicts in psychotherapy research. Psychotherapy Research, 19, 1–12. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources