The Answer Bot Effect (ABE): A powerful new form of influence made possible by intelligent personal assistants and search engines
- PMID: 35648736
- PMCID: PMC9159602
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268081
The Answer Bot Effect (ABE): A powerful new form of influence made possible by intelligent personal assistants and search engines
Abstract
We introduce and quantify a relatively new form of influence: the Answer Bot Effect (ABE). In a 2015 report in PNAS, researchers demonstrated the power that biased search results have to shift opinions and voting preferences without people's knowledge-by up to 80% in some demographic groups. They labeled this phenomenon the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME), speculating that its power derives from the high level of trust people have in algorithmically-generated content. We now describe three experiments with a total of 1,736 US participants conducted to determine to what extent giving users "the answer"-either via an answer box at the top of a page of search results or via a vocal reply to a question posed to an intelligent personal assistant (IPA)-might also impact opinions and votes. Participants were first given basic information about two candidates running for prime minister of Australia (this, in order to assure that participants were "undecided"), then asked questions about their voting preferences, then given answers to questions they posed about the candidates-either with answer boxes or with vocal answers on an Alexa simulator-and then asked again about their voting preferences. The experiments were controlled, randomized, double-blind, and counterbalanced. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that answer boxes can shift voting preferences by as much as 38.6% and that the appearance of an answer box can reduce search times and clicks on search results. Experiment 3 demonstrated that even a single question-and-answer interaction on an IPA can shift voting preferences by more than 40%. Multiple questions posed to an IPA leading to answers that all have the same bias can shift voting preferences by more than 65%. Simple masking procedures still produced large opinion shifts while reducing awareness of bias to close to zero. ABE poses a serious threat to both democracy and human autonomy because (a) it produces large shifts in opinions and voting preferences with little or no user awareness, (b) it is an ephemeral form of influence that leaves no paper trail, and (c) worldwide, it is controlled almost exclusively by just four American tech companies. ABE will become a greater threat as people increasingly rely on IPAs for answers.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Similar articles
-
The Video Manipulation Effect (VME): A quantification of the possible impact that the ordering of YouTube videos might have on opinions and voting preferences.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 20;19(11):e0303036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303036. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39565735 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The "multiple exposure effect" (MEE): How multiple exposures to similarly biased online content can cause increasingly larger shifts in opinions and voting preferences.PLoS One. 2025 May 12;20(5):e0322900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322900. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40354464 Free PMC article.
-
Can biased search results change people's opinions about anything at all? a close replication of the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME).PLoS One. 2024 Mar 26;19(3):e0300727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300727. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38530851 Free PMC article.
-
The search engine manipulation effect (SEME) and its possible impact on the outcomes of elections.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Aug 18;112(33):E4512-21. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419828112. Epub 2015 Aug 4. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015. PMID: 26243876 Free PMC article.
-
Voting systems for environmental decisions.Conserv Biol. 2014 Apr;28(2):322-32. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12209. Epub 2014 Jan 14. Conserv Biol. 2014. PMID: 24423154 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Video Manipulation Effect (VME): A quantification of the possible impact that the ordering of YouTube videos might have on opinions and voting preferences.PLoS One. 2024 Nov 20;19(11):e0303036. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303036. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39565735 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The "opinion matching effect" (OME): A subtle but powerful new form of influence that is apparently being used on the internet.PLoS One. 2024 Sep 12;19(9):e0309897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309897. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 39264925 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The "multiple exposure effect" (MEE): How multiple exposures to similarly biased online content can cause increasingly larger shifts in opinions and voting preferences.PLoS One. 2025 May 12;20(5):e0322900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322900. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40354464 Free PMC article.
-
Can biased search results change people's opinions about anything at all? a close replication of the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME).PLoS One. 2024 Mar 26;19(3):e0300727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300727. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38530851 Free PMC article.
-
The Multiple Platforms Effect (MPE): A quantification of how exposure to similarly biased content on multiple online platforms might impact users.PLoS One. 2025 Aug 1;20(8):e0327209. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327209. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 40748996 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Epstein R, Robertson RE. Suppressing the Search Engine Manipulation Effect (SEME). Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2017; 1(CSCW):1–22. doi: 10.1145/3134677 - DOI
-
- Haas A, Unkel J. Ranking versus reputation: perception and effects of search result credibility. Behav Inf Technol, 2017; 36(12):1285–1298. doi: 10.1080/0144929X.2017.1381166 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources