Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Nov;37(15):3931-3936.
doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07674-3. Epub 2022 Jun 1.

The Effect of Standardized Hospitalist Information Cards on the Patient Experience: a Quasi-Experimental Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

The Effect of Standardized Hospitalist Information Cards on the Patient Experience: a Quasi-Experimental Prospective Cohort Study

Muhammad Hasan Abid et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Communication with clinicians is an important component of a hospitalized patient's experience.

Objective: To test the impact of standardized hospitalist information cards on the patient experience.

Design: Quasi-experimental study in a U.S. tertiary-care center.

Participants: All-comer medicine inpatients.

Interventions: Standardized hospitalist information cards containing name and information on a hospitalist's role and availability vs. usual care.

Main measures: Patients' rating of the overall communication as excellent ("top-box" score); qualitative feedback summarized via inductive coding.

Key results: Five hundred sixty-six surveys from 418 patients were collected for analysis. In a multivariate regression model, standardized hospitalist information cards significantly improved the odds of a "top-box" score on overall communication (odds ratio: 2.32; 95% confidence intervals: 1.07-5.06). Other statistically significant covariates were patient age (0.98, 0.97-0.99), hospitalist role (physician vs. advanced practice provider, 0.56; 0.38-0.81), and hospitalist-patient gender combination (female-female vs. male-male, 2.14; 1.35-3.40). Eighty-seven percent of patients found the standardized hospitalist information cards useful, the perceived most useful information being how to contact the hospitalist and knowing their schedule.

Conclusions: Hospitalized patients' experience of their communication with hospitalists may be improved by using standardized hospitalist information cards. Younger patients cared for by a team with an advanced practice provider, as well as female patients paired with female providers, were more likely to be satisfied with the overall communication. Assessing the impact of information cards should be studied in other settings to confirm generalizability.

Keywords: communication [MeSH]; patient experience; patient satisfaction [MeSH]; patient-centered care [MeSH]; patient-reported outcome measures [MeSH]; physician-patient relations [MeSH].

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The co-authors report no conflict of interst.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of the number of participants approached, included, and excluded.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America . Crossing the Quality Chasm: a New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2001. - PubMed
    1. Wolf JA, Niederhauser V, Marshburn D, LaVela SL. Defining patient experience. Patient Exp J. 2014;1(1):3. doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1004. - DOI
    1. Batalden M, Batalden P, Margolis P, et al. Coproduction of healthcare service. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(7):509–17. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004315. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levinson W, Lesser CS, Epstein RM. Developing physician communication skills for patient-centered care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(7):1310–8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0450. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferranti DE, Makoul G, Forth VE, Rauworth J, Lee J, Williams MV. Assessing patient perceptions of hospitalist communication skills using the Communication Assessment Tool (CAT) J Hosp Med. 2010;5(9):522–7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.787. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources