Labor induction in China: a nationwide survey
- PMID: 35650545
- PMCID: PMC9158355
- DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04760-6
Labor induction in China: a nationwide survey
Abstract
Background: Overmedicalization in labor management and delivery, including labor induction, is an increasing global concern. But detailed epidemiological data on labor induction in China remains unclear.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study of data (2015-2016) from 96 hospitals in 24 (of 34) Chinese administrative divisions. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between medical conditions and cesarean delivery among women undergoing induction. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the association between the prelabor cesarean delivery and labor-induction rates in each hospital. The impacts of labor induction and prelabor cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared in low-risk women.
Results: Among 73 901 eligible participants, 48.1% were nulliparous. The overall weighted rate of labor induction in China was 14.2% (95% CI, 11.1-17.2%), with 18.4% (95% CI, 14.5-22.3%) in nulliparas and 10.2% (95% CI, 7.7-12.8%) in multiparas. Regardless of the induction method, the overall vaginal delivery rate was 72.9% (95% CI, 68.6-77.3%) in nulliparas and 86.6% (95% CI, 79.7-93.5%) in multiparas. Hospitals with a higher rate of nonmedically indicated cesarean delivery had a lower labor-induction rate in nulliparas (β = - 0.57%; 95% CI, - 0.92 to - 0.22%; P = 0.002). Compared with prelabor cesarean delivery, labor induction in low-risk women was not associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Conclusion: The 2015-2016 labor-induction rate in China was 18.4% in nulliparas and 10.2% in multiparas. The proportion of prelabor cesarean delivery may contribute to regional differences in the labor-induction rate. Compared with prelabor cesarean delivery, labor induction in low-risk women may not increase severe maternal and neonatal morbidity.
Keywords: Epidemiology; Labor induction; Obstetrics.
© 2022. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Maternal and newborn outcomes with elective induction of labor at term.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Mar;220(3):273.e1-273.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.01.223. Epub 2019 Feb 17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30716284
-
Impact of labor induction, gestational age, and maternal age on cesarean delivery rates.Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Aug;102(2):287-93. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00531-3. Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12907101
-
Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):341.e1-341.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.228. Epub 2017 Dec 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018. PMID: 29291413
-
Does induction of labor at term increase the risk of cesarean section in advanced maternal age? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Oct;253:213-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.08.022. Epub 2020 Aug 25. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020. PMID: 32889327
-
Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;221(4):304-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.046. Epub 2019 Feb 25. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 30817905
Cited by
-
Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study.J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 19;11(12):3519. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123519. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35743589 Free PMC article.
-
External validation and updating of the Rossi nomogram for predicting cesarean delivery following induction: is the Bishop score valuable?Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Aug;310(2):729-737. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07524-z. Epub 2024 May 28. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 38806943
-
The Association between Cervical Length and Successful Labor Induction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;20(2):1138. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021138. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36673893 Free PMC article.
-
Associations of primiparous pre-pregnancy body mass index and gestational weight gain with cesarean delivery after induction: a prospective cohort study.Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 30;11:1453620. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1453620. eCollection 2024. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024. PMID: 39281814 Free PMC article.
-
Midwives' experiences in the clinical management of oxytocin infusion for labor induction and augmentation: a qualitative study.BMC Nurs. 2025 Jul 11;24(1):909. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03556-1. BMC Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40646480 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for induction of labour. Geneva, Switzerland. 2011. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2011/WHO_RHR_11.10_eng.pdf - PubMed
-
- ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins -- Obstetrics ACOG practice bulletin No. 107: induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):386–97. - PubMed
-
- The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Inducing labor. NICE Guideline NG207; 2021. www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng207.
-
- Gibbons L, Belizán JM, Lauer Ja, Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Althabe F. The global numbers and costs of additionally needed and unnecessary caesarean sections performed per year: overuse as a barrier to universal coverage. World Heal Rep Backgr Pap. 2010;30:1–31.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical