Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 16:16:752471.
doi: 10.3389/fninf.2022.752471. eCollection 2022.

The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale

Affiliations

The Case for Optimized Edge-Centric Tractography at Scale

Joseph Y Moon et al. Front Neuroinform. .

Abstract

The anatomic validity of structural connectomes remains a significant uncertainty in neuroimaging. Edge-centric tractography reconstructs streamlines in bundles between each pair of cortical or subcortical regions. Although edge bundles provides a stronger anatomic embedding than traditional connectomes, calculating them for each region-pair requires exponentially greater computation. We observe that major speedup can be achieved by reducing the number of streamlines used by probabilistic tractography algorithms. To ensure this does not degrade connectome quality, we calculate the identifiability of edge-centric connectomes between test and re-test sessions as a proxy for information content. We find that running PROBTRACKX2 with as few as 1 streamline per voxel per region-pair has no significant impact on identifiability. Variation in identifiability caused by streamline count is overshadowed by variation due to subject demographics. This finding even holds true in an entirely different tractography algorithm using MRTrix. Incidentally, we observe that Jaccard similarity is more effective than Pearson correlation in calculating identifiability for our subject population.

Keywords: EDI; connectomes; diffusion MRI; edge-centric; identifiability; optimization; tractography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

GM discloses grants from the United States Department of Defense—TBI Endpoints Development Initiative (Grant #W81XWH-14-2-0176), TRACK-TBI Precision Medicine (Grant #W81XWH-18-2-0042), and TRACK-TBI NETWORK (Grant #W81XWH-15-9-0001); NIH-NINDS—TRACK-TBI (Grant #U01NS086090); and the National Football League (NFL) Scientific Advisory Board—TRACK-TBI LONGITUDINAL. The United States Department of Energy supports GM for a precision medicine collaboration. One Mind has provided funding for TRACK-TBI patients stipends and support to clinical sites. He has received an unrestricted gift from the NFL to the UCSF Foundation to support research efforts of the TRACK-TBI NETWORK. He has also received funding from NeuroTruama Sciences LLC to support TRACK-TBI data curation efforts. Additionally, Abbott Laboratories has provided funding for add-in TRACK-TBI clinical studies. AM receives funding from the Department of Defense TBI Endpoints Development Initiative (Grant #W81XWH-14-2-0176) and TRACK-TBI NETWORK (Grant #W81XWH-15-9-0001). She also receives salary support from the United States Department of Energy precision medicine collaboration and the philanthropic organization, One Mind. JM and P-TB are employed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of MaPPeRTrac pipeline.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overview of alternative pipeline with MRTrix.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean identifiability with all patients (q = 4 random seeds per streamline count, k = 20 subset size, r = 10 repetitions). For each streamline count, there are q data points with tractography running a unique random seed. Each data point represents the average of r repetitions of k randomly selected patients in order to normalize for dataset size.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean identifiability by category (q = 4 random seeds per streamline count, k = 20 subset size, r = 10 repetitions).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean identifiability across streamline counts (q = 4 random seeds per streamline count, k = 20 subset size, r = 10 repetitions).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Mean identifiability by correlation metric (q = 4 random seeds per streamline count, k = 20 subset size, r = 10 repetitions).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Comparison of graph metrics.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Mean identifiability with all patients using probabilistic MRTrix (q = 4 random seeds per streamline count, k = 20 subset size, r = 10 repetitions, iFOD2 algorithm).
Figure 9
Figure 9
Mean identifiability with all patients using deterministic MRTrix (SD_STREAM algorithm).

References

    1. Amico E., Goñi J. (2018). The quest for identifiability in human functional connectomes. Sci. Rep. 8, 8254. 10.1038/s41598-018-25089-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behrens T., Woolrich M., Jenkinson M., Johansen-Berg H., Nunes R., Clare S., et al. . (2003). Characterization and propagation of uncertainty in diffusion-weighted mr imaging. Mag. Reson. Med. 50, 1077–1088. 10.1002/mrm.10609 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betzel R. F., Byrge L., He Y., Goñi J., Zuo X.-N., Sporns O. (2014). Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage 102, 345–357. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.067 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Burgess G. C., Kandala S., Nolan D., Laumann T. O., Power J. D., Adeyemo B., et al. . (2016). Evaluation of denoising strategies to address motion-correlated artifacts in resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data from the human connectome project. Brain Connect. 6, 669–680. 10.1089/brain.2016.0435 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Contreras J. A., Goñi J., Risacher S. L., Sporns O., Saykin A. J. (2015). The structural and functional connectome and prediction of risk for cognitive impairment in older adults. Curr. Behav. Neurosci. Rep. 2, 234–245. 10.1007/s40473-015-0056-z - DOI - PMC - PubMed