Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 23:2022:2593844.
doi: 10.1155/2022/2593844. eCollection 2022.

Application Value of MRI Combined with MSCT in Diagnosis and Staging of Colon Carcinoma

Affiliations

Application Value of MRI Combined with MSCT in Diagnosis and Staging of Colon Carcinoma

Zhiwei Zhao et al. Comput Math Methods Med. .

Retraction in

Abstract

Objective: To clarify the application value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with multislice spiral computed tomography (MSCT) in the diagnosis and staging of colon carcinoma (CC).

Methods: A total of 103 patients with histopathologically diagnosed CC were enrolled. Patient clinical and imaging data were collected, and MRI and MSCT images were analyzed to assess the accuracy of MRI, MSCT, and their combination in diagnosing tumor (T) staging of CC.

Results: Among the 103 cases of histopathologically diagnosed CC, 26 cases (25.24) were in stage T1-2, 72 cases (69.90) were in stage T3, and 5 cases (4.85) were in stage T4. The accuracy of MRI in diagnosing stage T1-2, T3, and T4 was 80.77%, 88.89%, and 60.00%, respectively, with an average of 76.55%. The accuracy rates of MSCT in diagnosing T1-2, T3, and T4 stages were 73.08%, 90.27%, and 60.00%, respectively, with an average of 74.45%. The accuracy rates of MRI+MSCT in diagnosing T1-2, T3, and T4 were 88.46%, 95.83%, and 80.00%, respectively, with an average of 88.10%.

Conclusions: Compared with single use of MRI or MSCT, MRI+MSCT provides accurate imaging data with higher accuracy, which is more helpful for the T-staging evaluation of CC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Colon carcinoma case 1. (a) MRI sagittal T2WI (left) and enhanced T1WI (right) images; (b) MRI axial T1WI enhanced (left) and T1W1 plain scan (right) images; (c) MRI coronal T2WI high-resolution image (left) and T2WI image (right); (d) MSCT axial plain scan (left) and enhanced (right) images.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Colon carcinoma case 2. (a) MRI sagittal T2WI (left) and enhanced T1WI (right) images; (b) MRI axial T1WI enhanced (left) and T1W1 plain scan (right) images; (c) MRI coronal T2WI high-resolution image (left) and T2WI image (right); (d) MSCT axial plain scan (left) and enhanced (right) images.

References

    1. Sawicki T., Ruszkowska M., Danielewicz A., Niedzwiedzka E., Arlukowicz T., Przybylowicz K. E. A review of colorectal cancer in terms of epidemiology, risk factors, development, symptoms and diagnosis. Cancers (Basel) . 2021;13(9):p. 2025. doi: 10.3390/cancers13092025. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R. L., et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a Cancer Journal for Clinicians . 2021;71(3):209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold M., Abnet C. C., Neale R. E., et al. Global burden of 5 major types of gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology . 2020;159(1, article e315):335–349.e15. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Keum N., Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nature Reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology . 2019;16(12):713–732. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dekker E., Tanis P. J., Vleugels J. L. A., Kasi P. M., Wallace M. B. Colorectal cancer. Lancet . 2019;394(10207):1467–1480. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32319-0. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources