Predictive factors of academic success in neuromusculoskeletal anatomy among doctor of physical therapy students
- PMID: 35652252
- DOI: 10.1002/ase.2202
Predictive factors of academic success in neuromusculoskeletal anatomy among doctor of physical therapy students
Abstract
Predictors of academic success in anatomy have been studied, but not in Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) students. The objectives of this study were to (1) explore predictors of academic success in a DPT anatomy course, (2) evaluate sex-based differences in the predictors of academic success and their influence on anatomy course grade, and (3) investigate the influence of the DPT anatomy course on visual-spatial ability. Forty-nine DPT students completed a demographic questionnaire, Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (LASSI), and Mental Rotations Test (MRT) before the ten-week anatomy course (MRT-1) and repeated the MRT at the end of the course (MRT-2). Anatomy course grade was determined based on quizzes and written and practical examinations. Multiple regression analysis showed significant associations between the predictor variables age (p = 0.010) and the LASSI anxiety subscale (p = 0.017), which measures anxiety coping, with the anatomy course grade. On the MRT-1, male DPT students attempted and correctly answered more questions than females (both, p < 0.0001). Female students had higher LASSI self-regulation and use of academic resources subscale scores (both, p < 0.05). In the 44 DPT students that completed the MRT-2, the number of correct and attempted responses increased following the anatomy course (p < 0.0001). Age and anxiety coping, but not sex, are predictors of anatomy course grades in DPT students. Mental rotations test scores improved following the anatomy course. The LASSI should be used in other cohorts to identify students with low anxiety subscale scores in order to provide targeted support.
Keywords: examination; gross anatomy education; learning and study strategies; physical therapy education; predictors of academic success; undergraduate education; visual-spatial reasoning.
© 2022 American Association for Anatomy.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Amabile AH, Nixon-Cave K, Georgetti LJ, Sims AC. 2021. Front-loading of anatomy content has no effect on long-term anatomy knowledge retention among physical therapy students: A prospective cohort study. BMC Med Educ 21:491.
-
- Attardi SM, Gould DJ, Pratt RL, Roach VA. 2022. YouTube-based course orientation videos delivered prior to matriculation fail to alleviate medical student anxiety about anatomy. Anat Sci Educ (in press; doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2107).
-
- Attardi SM, Harmon DJ, Barremkala M, Bentley DC, Brown KM, Dennis JF, Goldman HM, Harrell KM, Klein BA, Ramnanan CJ, Farkas GJ. 2022. An analysis of anatomy education before and during Covid-19: August-December 2020. Anat Sci Educ 15:5-26.
-
- Berney S, Bétrancourt M, Molinari G, Hoyek N. 2015. How spatial abilities and dynamic visualizations interplay when learning functional anatomy with 3D anatomical models. Anat Sci Educ 8:452-462.
-
- Bogomolova K, Vorstenbosch MA, El Messaoudi I, Holla M, Hovius SER, van der Hage JA, Hierck BP. 2022. Effect of binocular disparity on learning anatomy with stereoscopic augmented reality visualization: A double center randomized controlled trial. Anat Sci Educ (in press; doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2164).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
