Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;11(4):196-206.
doi: 10.1007/s40037-022-00714-y. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Management reasoning scripts: Qualitative exploration using simulated physician-patient encounters

Affiliations

Management reasoning scripts: Qualitative exploration using simulated physician-patient encounters

David A Cook et al. Perspect Med Educ. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Management reasoning is distinct from diagnostic reasoning and remains incompletely understood. The authors sought to empirically investigate the concept of management scripts.

Methods: In November 2020, 4 investigators each reviewed 10 video clips of simulated outpatient physician-patient encounters, and used a coding form to document observations about management reasoning. The team used constant comparative analysis to integrate empirically-grounded insights with theories related to cognitive scripts and Type 1/Type 2 thinking.

Results: Management scripts are precompiled conceptual knowledge structures that represent and connect management options and clinician tasks in a temporal or logical sequence. Management scripts appear to differ substantially from illness scripts. Management scripts varied in quality (in content, sequence, flexibility, and fluency) and generality. The authors empirically identified six key features (components) of management scripts: the problem (diagnosis); management options; preferences, values, and constraints; education needs; interactions; and encounter flow. The authors propose a heuristic framework describing script activation, selection, instantiation with case-specific details, and application to guide development of the management plan. They further propose that management reasoning reflects iterative, back-and-forth involvement of both Type 1 (non-analytic, effortless) and Type 2 (analytic, effortful) thinking. Type 1 thinking likely influences initial script activation, selection, and initial instantiation. Type 2 increasingly influences subsequent script revisions, as activation, selection, and instantiation become more deliberate (effortful) and more hypothetical (involving mental simulation).

Discussion: Management scripts constitute a key feature of management reasoning, and could represent a new target for training in clinical reasoning (distinct from illness scripts).

Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Diagnostic errors; Diagnostic reasoning; Education, medical; Therapeutic reasoning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D.A. Cook, C.R. Stephenson, L.D. Gruppen and S.J. Durning declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Model of management reasoning script. Management scripts are “precompiled conceptual knowledge structures that represent and connect management options and clinician tasks in a temporal or logical sequence to facilitate development of a rational management plan” [14]. Although initial script activation, selection, and instantiation are likely (usually) predominantly Type 1 thinking, with each iteration the script and associated management tasks (usually) employ more Type 2 thinking. The list of management tasks is illustrative, not comprehensive. EHR electronic health record

References

    1. Cook DA, Sherbino J, Durning SJ. Management reasoning: beyond the diagnosis. JAMA. 2018;319:2267–2268. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4385. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cook DA, Durning SJ, Sherbino J, Gruppen LD. Management reasoning: Implications for health professions educators and a research agenda. Acad Med. 2019;94:1310–1316. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002768. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norman GR, Monteiro SD, Sherbino J, Ilgen JS, Schmidt HG, Mamede S. The causes of errors in clinical reasoning: cognitive biases, knowledge deficits, and dual process thinking. Acad Med. 2017;92:23–30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001421. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Norman G, Young M, Brooks L. Non-analytical models of clinical reasoning: the role of experience. Med Educ. 2007;41:1140–1145. - PubMed
    1. Elstein AS, Shulman LS, Sprafka SA. Medical problem solving: an analysis of clinical reasoning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1978.

Publication types