Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 7;119(23):e2204557119.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.2204557119. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor instructs the immunomodulatory profile of a subset of Clec4a4+ eosinophils unique to the small intestine

Affiliations

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor instructs the immunomodulatory profile of a subset of Clec4a4+ eosinophils unique to the small intestine

Wei-Le Wang et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

C-type lectin domain family 4, member a4 (Clec4a4) is a C-type lectin inhibitory receptor specific for glycans thought to be exclusively expressed on murine CD8α− conventional dendritic cells. Using newly generated Clec4a4-mCherry knock-in mice, we identify a subset of Clec4a4-expressing eosinophils uniquely localized in the small intestine lamina propria. Clec4a4+ eosinophils evinced an immunomodulatory signature, whereas Clec4a4− eosinophils manifested a proinflammatory profile. Clec4a4+ eosinophils expressed high levels of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (Ahr), which drove the expression of Clec4a4 as well as other immunomodulatory features, such as PD-L1. The abundance of Clec4a4+ eosinophils was dependent on dietary AHR ligands, increased with aging, and declined in inflammatory conditions. Mice lacking AHR in eosinophils expanded innate lymphoid cells of type 2 and cleared Nippostrongylus brasiliensis infection more effectively than did wild-type mice. These results highlight the heterogeneity of eosinophils in response to tissue cues and identify a unique AHR-dependent subset of eosinophils in the small intestine with an immunomodulatory profile.

Keywords: allergy; aryl hydrocarbon receptor; eosinophil; helminth; intestine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interest statement: M. Colonna receives research support from Pfizer, Aclaris, Ono, NGM Biopharmaceutical, Oncorus, and VigilNeuro; serves on the scientific advisory boards of Vigil Neuro and NGM Biopharmaceutical; and is consultant for Cell Signaling Technologies. All other authors have nothing to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
A heterogeneous population of Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 eosinophils resides in the small intestine. (A) Targeting strategy to generate Clec4a4mCherry/+ mice. CDS, coding sequence; H2B, human histone H2B; T2A, T2A self-cleaving peptide; UTR, untranslated region. (B) Expression of Clec4a4 and mCherry in splenic CD11b+ cDCs. (C) Frequency of mCherry+ cells among CD45+ cells (gated on live cells) in the indicated tissues (n = 3 to 7). DLN, skin-draining lymph node; LP, lamina propria; MLN, mesenteric lymph node. (D) mCherry expression on CD11chigh and CD11clow CD45+ cells derived from siLP (gated on live cells). (E) Expression of CD11b, CD103, Siglec-F, and MHC class II on mCherry+ CD11chigh CD45+ cells and mCherry+ CD11clow CD45+ cells derived from siLP (gated on live cells). (F) mCherry expression in Siglec-F+ eosinophils derived from siLP (gated on SSChigh MHC class II CD11b+ cells). (G) Representative pictures of FACS-sorted mCherry+ and mCherry eosinophils from siLP. (H) CCR3 expression in mCherry+ and mCherry eosinophils in siLP. (I) Representative image showing localization of Siglec-F+mCherry+ eosinophils in siLP villi of Clec4a4mCherry/+ mice. Inset is an enlargement of I. DAPI, 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. (J) mCherry expression in eosinophils in the indicated tissues. (K) Parabiosis of CD45.1 WT and CD45.2 Clec4a4mCherry/+ mice indicates that eosinophils recirculate in siLP, blood, and lung but much less so in BM; Clec4A4 mCherry is only expressed by eosinophils in the siLP. (L) Frequency of parabiont-derived eosinophils in the indicated tissues. (M) Frequency of parabiont-derived mCherry+ eosinophils in the indicated tissues. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated using one-way ANOVA and the Tukey's multiple comparisons test or the two-tailed Student’s t test. ns, not significant. ***P < 0.001; ****P < 0.0001.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Transcriptomic profiling and characterization of Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 eosinophil subsets. (A) Volcano plot of differentially expressed genes in mCherry+ and mCherry eosinophils (n = 5 replicates in each group). Transcripts with FC (fold change) > 2 and P < 0.05 in mCherry+ and mCherry eosinophils are depicted in red and blue, respectively. (B) Heat map of selected genes specific to Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 eosinophils. (C) Differential expression of cell surface (CD22, PECAM1, PD-L1, and LPAM1) and intracellular markers (CD68) by Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 siLP eosinophils. (D) Expression of the markers indicated in C by eosinophils from the indicated tissues. LP, lamina propria. (E, Left) Expression of Clec4a4 and PD-L1 in eosinophils derived from siLP. (E, Right) Frequency of Clec4a4+PD-L1+ and Clec4a4PD-L1lo eosinophils in the siLP. (F) Enrichment plots demonstrating up-regulated cholesterol homeostasis and TNFα signaling via NF-κB in mCherry+ and mCherry eosinophils, respectively. NES, normalized enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate. (G) Biochemical pathways for de novo cholesterol synthesis. CoA, coenzyme A; HMG, hydroxymethylglutaryl. (H) Heat map of genes associated with cholesterol synthesis pathways in mCherry+ and mCherry eosinophils. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated using the two-tailed Student’s t test. **P < 0.01.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Development of the Clec4a4+ eosinophil subset is dependent on aging and on the AHR pathway. (A) Heat map of Ahr and Cyp1b1 in mCherry+ and mCherry eosinophils. (B) qRT-PCR of Ahr and Cyp1b1 transcripts in Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 eosinophils (n = 4 replicates). (C) Clec4a4 expression in splenic CD11b+ cDCs and siLP eosinophils from WT and Ahr−/− mice. (D) Absolute numbers of Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 eosinophils in WT and Ahr−/− mice (n = 3 in each group). (E) Experimental strategy for mixed BM chimeras. (F) Clec4a4 expression in splenic CD11b+ cDCs and siLP eosinophils derived from WT and Ahr−/− BM cells after reconstitution. (G) Frequency of Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 splenic CD11b+ cDCs and siLP eosinophils in BM chimeras. (H) Frequency of Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 siLP eosinophils in WT mice at 1, 2, and 10 to 12 wk of age (n = 3, 6, and 7 replicates, respectively) and in GF mice (n = 5). (I) Experimental time line for feeding mice with a purified diet free of AHR ligands or a purified diet containing the AHR ligand I3C. (J) Representative Clec4a4 expression in siLP eosinophils derived from mice fed with a purified diet free of AHR ligands or a purified diet containing AHR ligands. (K) Frequency of Clec4a4+ and Clec4a4 siLP eosinophils in mice fed with a purified diet free of AHR ligands (n = 4) or a purified diet containing AHR ligands (n = 5). Results are shown as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated using the two-tailed Student’s t test. NS, not significant. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Clec4a4+ eosinophils modulate type 2 immunity during helminth infection. (A) Egg counts in feces of WT and Clec4a4-deficient (Clec4a4mCherry/mCherry) mice (n = 13 in each group) at the indicated time points during H. polygyrus infection. (B) Expression of Clec4a4 and PD-L1 in siLP eosinophils derived from Ahrfl/+ and EoCreAhrfl/fl mice. (C) Frequency of Clec4a4+PD-L1+ and Clec4a4PD-L1lo siLP eosinophils in Ahrfl/+ and EoCreAhrfl/fl mice (n = 3 each group). (D) Worm counts in Ahrfl/fl (n = 12) and EoCreAhrfl/fl (n = 15) mice at day 6 postinfection with N. brasiliensis. (E) Representative percentages of KLRG1+ ILC2s among CD45+ cells in mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) of Ahrfl/fl and EoCreAhrfl/fl mice. A gate was applied on lineage-negative cells. Lineage markers included CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, and NK1.1. (F) Frequency of ILC2s in MLNs from Ahrfl/fl (n = 12) and EoCreAhrfl/fl (n = 14) mice at day 6 postinfection with N. brasiliensis. Results are shown as mean ± SEM. P values were calculated using the two-tailed Student’s t test or one-way ANOVA and the Tukey's multiple comparisons test. NS, not significant. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.

References

    1. Weller P. F., Spencer L. A., Functions of tissue-resident eosinophils. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 17, 746–760 (2017). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rothenberg M. E., Hogan S. P., The eosinophil. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24, 147–174 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Gleich G. J., Adolphson C. R., Leiferman K. M., The biology of the eosinophilic leukocyte. Annu. Rev. Med. 44, 85–101 (1993). - PubMed
    1. Acharya K. R., Ackerman S. J., Eosinophil granule proteins: Form and function. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 17406–17415 (2014). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hamann K. J., et al. , In vitro killing of microfilariae of Brugia pahangi and Brugia malayi by eosinophil granule proteins. J. Immunol. 144, 3166–3173 (1990). - PubMed

Publication types