Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;69(3):272-284.
doi: 10.1111/inr.12772. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Nursing stakeholder identification guidelines for human resources for health and health workforce development: A scoping review

Affiliations

Nursing stakeholder identification guidelines for human resources for health and health workforce development: A scoping review

Natasha North et al. Int Nurs Rev. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the existence of guidelines on the identification of nursing stakeholders as part of planning for human resources for health processes.

Background: Effective involvement of nursing stakeholders in planning and implementing human resources for health policies is strongly advocated by leading global bodies. Systematic identification of nursing stakeholders at an early stage is fundamentally important. Guidelines to support appropriate identification and inclusion of nursing stakeholders could support the active involvement of nurses and midwives in human resources for health planning processes at all levels.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for scoping reviews. We conducted a widely inclusive search for all types of records, including searches of bibliographic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science) and manual searches of selected websites and internet archives to identify grey literature, published in English since 2009. Search terms related to guidelines, stakeholder engagement and the health workforce.

Results: Of the 1058 potentially relevant sources identified, two studies met inclusion criteria. Both were guidelines produced by global bodies more than 12 years ago. Cochrane guidance on reporting 'near-empty' reviews was followed, and eight additional sources meeting most of the inclusion criteria were identified and critiqued.

Conclusions: Guidelines regarding the process of nursing stakeholder identification specific to human resources for health planning processes are scarce and require updating. Critique of recent practices suggests considerable methodological variety and sub-optimal identification of nursing stakeholders.

Implications for nursing and health policy: Nursing stakeholder engagement is an essential component of human resources for health planning processes, and the gap in literature points to a need for up-to-date guidance to ensure nurses' active involvement.

Keywords: guideline; health personnel; health workforce; stakeholder participation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA‐ScR) diagram

References

    1. Afriyie, D.O. , Nyoni, J. & Ahmat, A. (2019) The state of strategic plans for the health workforce in Africa. BMJ Global Health, 4(9), e001115. 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001115 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Akwanalo, C. , Njuguna, B. , Mercer, T. , Pastakia, S.D. , Mwangi, A. , Dick, J. et al. (2019) Strategies for effective stakeholder engagement in strengthening referral networks for management of hypertension across health systems in Kenya. Global Heart, 14(2), 173–179. 10.1016/j.gheart.2019.06.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. All‐Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on Global Health . (2016) Triple impact: how developing nursing will improve health, promote gender equality and support economic growth. London: APPG on Global Health. Available at: https://www.who.int/hrh/com‐heeg/digital‐APPG_triple‐impact.pdf [Accessed 5th October 2020].
    1. Arksey, H. & O'malley, L. (2005) Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 - DOI
    1. Bird, M. , Mcgillion, M. , Chambers, E.M. , Dix, J. , Fajardo, C. J. , Gilmour, M. et al. (2021) A generative co‐design framework for healthcare innovation: development and application of an end‐user engagement framework. Research Involvement and Engagement, 7(1), 1–12. 10.1186/s40900-021-00252-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types