Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Sep;33(9):1790-1795.
doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022010086. Epub 2022 Jun 2.

Sources of Variation in the Carbon Footprint of Hemodialysis Treatment

Affiliations

Sources of Variation in the Carbon Footprint of Hemodialysis Treatment

Ashwini R Sehgal et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Greenhouse gas emissions from hemodialysis treatment in the United States have not been quantified. In addition, no previous studies have examined how much emissions vary across facilities, treatments, and emission contributors.

Methods: To estimate the magnitude and sources of variation in the carbon footprint of hemodialysis treatment, we estimated life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) associated with 209,481 hemodialysis treatments in 2020 at 15 Ohio hemodialysis facilities belonging to the same organization. We considered emissions from electricity, natural gas, water, and supply use; patient and staff travel distance; and biohazard and landfill waste.

Results: Annual emissions per facility averaged 769,374 kg CO2-eq (95% CI, 709,388 to 848,180 kg CO2-eq). The three largest contributors to total emissions were patient and staff transportation (28.3%), electricity (27.4%), and natural gas (15.2%). Emissions per treatment were 58.9 kg CO2-eq, with a three-fold variation across facilities. The contributors with the largest variation in emissions per treatment were transportation, natural gas, and water (coefficients of variation, 62.5%, 42.4%, and 37.7%, respectively). The annual emissions per hemodialysis facility are equivalent to emissions from the annual energy use in 93 homes; emissions per treatment are equivalent to driving an average automobile for 238 km (149 miles).

Conclusions: Similar medical treatments provided in a single geographic region by facilities that are part of the same organization may be expected to have small variations in the determinants of greenhouse gas emissions. However, we found substantial variation in carbon footprints across facilities, treatments, and emission contributors. Understanding the magnitude and variation in greenhouse gas emissions may help identify measures to reduce the environmental effect of hemodialysis treatment.

Keywords: carbon footprint; hemodialysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Contributors to carbon footprint of hemodialysis (n=15 facilities). The y axis indicates magnitude of emissions per treatment, with error bars representing upper and lower CIs. For example, electricity use is associated with 15.7 kg CO2-eq emissions per treatment (CI, 12.1 to 20.4 kg CO2-eq). The x axis indicates variation across facilities. For example, natural gas use is associated with a 42.4% coefficient of variation in emissions per treatment across the 15 facilities. Other contributors with either a high magnitude of emissions or extensive variation across facilities include landfill waste, water, and transportation. By contrast, supply use and biohazard waste have lower magnitudes and variation.

Comment in

References

    1. United States Renal Data Systems : United States Renal Data Systems 2020 Annual Report. Available at: https://adr.usrds.org/2020. Accessed April 8, 2022
    1. Barraclough KA, Agar JWM: Green nephrology. Nat Rev Nephrol 16: 257–268, 2020 - PubMed
    1. Eckelman MJ, Huang K, Lagasse R, Senay E, Dubrow R, Sherman JD: Health care pollution and public health damage in the United States: An update. Health Aff (Millwood) 39: 2071–2079, 2020 - PubMed
    1. Connor A, Lillywhite R, Cooke MW: The carbon footprints of home and in-center maintenance hemodialysis in the United Kingdom. Hemodial Int 15: 39–51, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Lim AE, Perkins A, Agar JW: The carbon footprint of an Australian satellite haemodialysis unit. Aust Health Rev 37: 369–374, 2013 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources