Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jun 2;13(1):3082.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30895-3.

Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar

Affiliations

Duration of mRNA vaccine protection against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants in Qatar

Hiam Chemaitelly et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants are genetically divergent. We conducted a matched, test-negative, case-control study to estimate duration of protection of the second and third/booster doses of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines against BA.1 and BA.2 infections in Qatar. BNT162b2 effectiveness was highest at 46.6% (95% CI: 33.4-57.2%) against symptomatic BA.1 and at 51.7% (95% CI: 43.2-58.9%) against symptomatic BA.2 infections in the first three months after the second dose, but declined to ~10% or below thereafter. Effectiveness rebounded to 59.9% (95% CI: 51.2-67.0%) and 43.7% (95% CI: 36.5-50.0%), respectively, in the first month after the booster dose, before declining again. Effectiveness against COVID-19 hospitalization and death was 70-80% after the second dose and >90% after the booster dose. mRNA-1273 vaccine protection showed similar patterns. mRNA vaccines provide comparable, moderate, and short-lived protection against symptomatic BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron infections, but strong and durable protection against COVID-19 hospitalization and death.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.A.B. has received institutional grant funding from Gilead Sciences unrelated to the work presented in this paper. Otherwise, we declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Distribution of SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 versus BA.2 Omicron infections.
Proportion of Omicron infections with the BA.1 (versus BA.2) subvariant in PCR-positive tests assessed using TaqPath COVID-19 Combo Kit during the study period.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Study population selection process.
Flowchart describing the population selection process for investigating effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines during the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection wave.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 and BA.2 Omicron infections.
Effectiveness (a) of the BNT162b2 vaccine and (b) of the mRNA-1273 vaccine. a Includes 7022 and 12,278 biologically independent samples for cases and controls, respectively, in the BA.1 analysis and 21,541 biologically independent samples for each of cases and controls in the BA.2 analysis in the BNT162b2 vaccine study. b includes 3574 and 6176 biologically independent samples for cases and controls, respectively, in the BA.1 analysis and 13,537 biologically independent samples for each of cases and controls in the BA.2 analysis in the mRNA-1273 vaccine study. Data are presented as effectiveness point estimates. Error bars indicate the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against any symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection regardless of subvariant and against severe COVID-19.
Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 vaccines against any symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection regardless of subvariant (panels a and b, respectively) and against any severe, critical, or fatal COVID-19 due to an Omicron infection (c, d, respectively). a Includes 39,855 and 23,814 biologically independent samples for cases and controls, respectively, (b) includes 21,810 and 13,288 biologically independent samples for cases and controls, respectively, (c) includes 268 and 692 biologically independent samples for cases and controls, respectively, and (d) includes 164 and 404 biologically independent samples for cases and controls, respectively. Data are presented as effectiveness point estimates. Error bars indicate the corresponding 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants. https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/. Accessed 25 Jan 2022. (2022). - PubMed
    1. National Project of Surveillance for Variants of Concern and Viral Genome Sequencing. Qatar viral genome sequencing data. Data on randomly collected samples. https://www.gisaid.org/phylodynamics/global/nextstrain/. Accessed 6 Feb 2022. (2022).
    1. Altarawneh HN, et al. Protection against the Omicron variant from previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;386:1288–1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2200133. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chemaitelly, H. et al. Protection of Omicron sub-lineage infection against reinfection with another Omicron sub-lineage. medRxiv10.1101/2022.02.24.22271440 (2022). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abu-Raddad, L. J. et al. Effect of mRNA vaccine boosters against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection in Qatar. N. Engl J. Med.386, 1804–1816 (2022). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types