Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 17:10:883299.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.883299. eCollection 2022.

Symptom Recognition as a Mediator in the Self-Care of Chronic Illness

Affiliations

Symptom Recognition as a Mediator in the Self-Care of Chronic Illness

Barbara Riegel et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The recognition of a symptom is needed to initiate a decision to engage in a behavior to ameliorate the symptom. Yet, a surprising number of individuals fail to detect symptoms and delay in addressing early warnings of a health problem.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that symptom recognition mediates the relationship between monitoring for and management of symptoms of a chronic illness.

Methods: A secondary analysis of existing cross-sectional data. A sample of 1,629 patients diagnosed with one or more chronic conditions was enrolled in the United States (US) (n = 407), Italy (n = 784) and Sweden (n = 438) between March 2015 and May 2019. Data on self-care monitoring, symptom recognition, and self-care management was assessed using the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory. After confirming metric invariance in cultural assessment, we used structural equation modeling to test a mediation model where symptom recognition was conceptualized as the mediator linking self-care monitoring and self-care management with autonomous (e.g., Change your activity level) and consulting behaviors (e.g., Call your healthcare provider for guidance).

Results: Symptom recognition mediated the relation between self-care monitoring and autonomous self-care management behaviors (β = 0.098, β = 0.122, β = 0.081, p < 0.001 for US, Italy, and Sweden, respectively). No mediation effect was found for consulting self-care management behaviors.

Conclusion: Our findings suggests that symptom recognition promotes autonomous self-care behaviors in people with a chronic condition. Self-care monitoring directly affects consulting self-care management behaviors but not through symptom recognition. Further research is needed to fully understand the role of symptom recognition in the self-care process.

Keywords: chronic disease; chronic illness; interoception; mediation analysis; self-care; self-management; symptom perception; symptom recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The response to symptoms requires that the symptom is detected, presumably through the behaviors of self-care monitoring. Monitoring involves actively noticing typical symptoms and checking for the presence of bodily changes. Symptom detection precedes perception, which involves becoming consciously aware of the symptom. Once detected and perceived, interpretation and the assignment of meaning occurs, which leads to symptom recognition. Symptom recognition is required before a self-care management response can be expected to occur.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graphic illustration of the way responses to this question can be analyzed.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Direct effects of self-care monitoring on autonomous and consulting self-care management behaviors are shown to occur via item #14 (symptom recognition) in a sample of patients from the United States, Italy, and Sweden (n = 1615). Note that the dashed arrow indicates the direct effects were not statistically significant. The error standard is shown in brackets. Key: SC-CII: Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory; a: p-value 0.05; b: p-value < 0.05; US, United States; ITA, Italy; SWE, Sweden.

References

    1. Lam C, Smeltzer SC. Patterns of symptom recognition, interpretation, and response in heart failure patients: an integrative review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2013) 28:348–59. 10.1097/JCN.0b013e3182531cf7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jurgens CY. The value of patient perception of heart failure symptoms: commentary on physical and psychological symptom biomechanics in moderate to advanced heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2016) 31:140–1. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000233 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee KS, Oh S. An integrative review of the symptom perception process in heart failure. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2020) 37:122–33. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000750 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee S, Riegel B. State of the science in heart failure symptom perception research: an integrative review. J Cardiovasc Nurs. (2018) 33:204–10. 10.1097/JCN.0000000000000445 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Riegel B, Dickson VV, Lee CS, Daus M, Hill J, Irani E, et al. . A mixed methods study of symptom perception in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Lung. (2018) 47:107–14. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2017.11.002 - DOI - PMC - PubMed