Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 17:4:760296.
doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.760296. eCollection 2022.

Anaerobic Contribution Determined in Free-Swimming: Sensitivity to Maturation Stages and Validity

Affiliations

Anaerobic Contribution Determined in Free-Swimming: Sensitivity to Maturation Stages and Validity

Eduardo Zapaterra Campos et al. Front Sports Act Living. .

Abstract

Evaluation of anaerobic contribution is important under swimming settings (training and modification through ages), therefore, it is expected to change during maturation. The accumulated oxygen deficit (AOD) method can be used to determine the contribution of nonoxidative energy during swimming; however, it requires several days of evaluation. An alternative method to estimate anaerobic contribution evaluation (ACALT), which can also be evaluated without snorkel (i.e., free-swimming, ACFS), has been proposed; however, these methods have never been compared. Thus, this study (i) analyzed the effect of maturation stage on ACFS during maximal 400 m swimming (Part I), and (ii) compared AOD with ACALT and ACFS, determined in a maximal 400 m effort (Part II). In Part I, 34 swimmers were divided into three groups, according to maturation stages (early-pubertal, middle-pubertal, and pubertal), and subjected to a maximal 400 m free-swimming to determine ACFS. In Part II, six swimmers were subjected to one 400 m maximal effort, and four submaximal constant efforts. The AOD was determined by the difference between the estimated demand and accumulated oxygen during the entire effort. The ACALT and ACFS (for Part I as well) was assumed as the sum of lactic and alactic anaerobic contributions. ACFS was higher in pubertal (3.8 ± 1.1 L) than early (2.1 ± 0.9 L) and middle pubertal group (2.4 ± 1.1 L). No difference was observed among absolute AOD (3.2 ± 1.3 L), ACALT (3.2 ± 1.5 L), and ACFS (4.0 ± 0.9 L) (F = 3.6; p = 0.06). Relative AOD (51.8 ± 12.2 mL·kg-1), ACALT (50.5 ± 14.3 mL·kg-1), and ACFS (65.2 ± 8.8 mL·kg-1) presented main effect (F = 4.49; p = 0.04), without posthoc difference. The bias of AOD vs. ACALT was 0.04 L, and AOD vs. ACFS was -0.74 L. The limits of agreement between AOD and ACALT were +0.9 L and -0.8 L, and between AOD and ACFS were +0.7 L and -2.7 L. It can be concluded that ACFS determination is a feasible tool to determine anaerobic contribution in young swimmers, and it changes during maturation stages. Also, ACFS might be useful to measure anaerobic contribution in swimmers, especially because it allows greater speeds.

Keywords: accumulated oxygen deficit; anaerobic contribution; maturation; swimming; young swimmers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Experimental design for Part I and Part II. Arrows represent blood sample to determine lactate concentration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
VO2 data from 400 m swimming and recovery. Gray line indicates bi-exponential adjustment. Alactic anaerobic contribution was assumed as the product between A1 and t1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean and standard deviation for speed during the 400 m partial (□; left axis), and estimated demand calculated for each 25 m portion (•; right axis).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean and standard deviation of ACFS (anaerobic contribution) determined in free-swimming in different maturation stages. *Significantly higher than early-pubertal and middle-pubertal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Mean and standard deviation of absolute (white bar) and relative (gray bar) of AOD, ACALT, and ACFS.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Bland and Altman agreement analysis between AOD and ACALT, AOD and ACFS, and ACALT, and ACFS.

References

    1. Andrade V. L., Kalva-Filho C. A., Ribeiro N. X., Gobbi R. B., de Arruda T. B., Papoti M. (2021). Determination of maximum accumulated oxygen deficit using backward extrapolation. Int. J. Sports Med. 42, 161–168. 10.1055/a-1082-1372 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barbosa T. M., Fernandes R., Keskinen K. L., Colaco P., Cardoso C., Silva J., et al. . (2006). Evaluation of the energy expenditure in competitive swimming strokes. Int. J. Sports Med. 27, 894–899. 10.1055/s-2006-923776 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beneke R., Hütler M., Leithäuser R. M. (2007). Anaerobic performance and metabolism in boys and male adolescents. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 101, 671–677. 10.1007/s00421-007-0546-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bertuzzi R., Melegati J., Bueno S., Ghiarone T., Pasqua L. A., Gáspari A. F., et al. . (2016). GEDAE-LaB: a free software to calculate the energy system contributions during exercise. PLoS ONE 11:e0145733. 10.1371/journal.pone.0145733 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertuzzi R. C., Franchini E., Ugrinowitsch C., Kokubun E., Lima-Silva A. E., Pires F. O., et al. . (2010). Predicting MAOD using only a supramaximal exhaustive test. Int. J. Sports Med. 31, 477–481. 10.1055/s-0030-1253375 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources