Reliability and Validity of the Functional Movement Screen™ with a Modified Scoring System for Young Adults with Low Back Pain
- PMID: 35655963
- PMCID: PMC9135473
- DOI: 10.26603/001c.23427
Reliability and Validity of the Functional Movement Screen™ with a Modified Scoring System for Young Adults with Low Back Pain
Abstract
Background: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common complaints in individuals who seek medical care and is a leading cause of movement impairments. The Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) was developed to evaluate neuromuscular impairments during movement. However, the reliability and validity of the FMS™ have not yet been established for the LBP population because of a limitation of its original scoring system.
Purpose: The purposes of this study were to determine the reliability and validity of the FMS™ with a modified scoring system in young adults with and without LBP. The FMS™ scores were modified by assigning a zero score only when there was an increase in LBP during the FMS™, not simply for the presence of pain, as in the original FMS™ scoring system.
Study design: Reliability and validity study.
Methods: Twenty-two participants with LBP (8 males and 14 females, 26.7 ± 4.68 years old) and 22 age- and gender-matched participants without LBP (26.64 ± 4.20 years old) completed the study. Each participant performed the FMS™ once while being scored simultaneously and independently by two investigators. In addition, each participant's FMS™ performance was video-recorded and then was scored by another two investigators separately. The video-recorded performance also was scored twice six weeks apart by the same investigator to determine intra-rater reliability.
Results: The results showed excellent inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the FMS™ composite score with intraclass correlation coefficients ranging from 0.93 to 0.99 for both groups. In addition, the LBP group scored significantly lower than the group without LBP (p = 0.008).
Conclusions: The results indicate that the FMS™ is able to distinguish between individuals with and without LBP, and that it could be a useful test for clinicians to quantify movement quality and to assess movement restrictions in individuals with LBP.
Levels of evidence: 2b.
Keywords: construct validity; interrater reliability; intra-rater reliability; lumbar spine; movement impairments movement system.
Conflict of interest statement
No conflicts of interest were present in this study.
References
-
- Waterman BR, Belmont PJ Jr, Schoenfeld AJ. Low back pain in the United States: Incidence and risk factors for presentation in the emergency setting. Spine J. 2012;12(1):63-70. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2011.09.002 - PubMed
-
- Lehtola V, Luomajoki H, Leinonen V, Gibbons S, Airaksinen O. Efficacy of movement control exercises versus general exercises on recurrent sub-acute nonspecific low back pain in a sub-group of patients with movement control dysfunction. Protocol of a randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):55. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-13-55 - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous