Flash glucose monitoring system in special situations
- PMID: 35657123
- PMCID: PMC10118756
- DOI: 10.20945/2359-3997000000479
Flash glucose monitoring system in special situations
Abstract
The management of diabetes mellitus (DM) requires maintaining glycemic control, and patients must keep their blood glucose levels close to the normal range to reduce the risk of microvascular complications and cardiovascular events. While glycated hemoglobin (A1C) is currently the primary measure for glucose management and a key marker for long-term complications, it does not provide information on acute glycemic excursions and overall glycemic variability. These limitations may even be higher in some special situations, thereby compromising A1C accuracy, especially when wider glycemic variability is expected and/or when the glycemic goal is more stringent. To attain adequate glycemic control, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is more useful than self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG), as it is more convenient and provides a greater amount of data. Flash Glucose Monitoring (isCGM /FGM) is a widely accepted option of CGM for measuring interstitial glucose levels in individuals with DM. However, its application under special conditions, such as pregnancy, patients on hemodialysis, patients with cirrhosis, during hospitalization in the intensive care unit and during physical exercise has not yet been fully validated. This review addresses some of these specific situations in which hypoglycemia should be avoided, or in pregnancy, where strict glycemic control is essential, and the application of isCGM/FGM could alleviate the shortcomings associated with poor glucose control or high glycemic variability, thereby contributing to high-quality care.
Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; blood glucose self-monitoring; liver cirrhosis; pregnancy; renal dialysis.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Beyond HbA1c.J Diabetes. 2017 Dec;9(12):1052-1053. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12590. Epub 2017 Sep 13. J Diabetes. 2017. PMID: 28792665
-
Effects of real-time continuous glucose monitoring in type 1 diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Acta Diabetol. 2021 Apr;58(4):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01589-3. Epub 2020 Aug 13. Acta Diabetol. 2021. PMID: 32789691
-
Can the Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Improve Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Receiving Dialysis?Nephron. 2023;147(2):91-96. doi: 10.1159/000525676. Epub 2022 Jul 13. Nephron. 2023. PMID: 35830847 Review.
-
Real-time CGM Is Superior to Flash Glucose Monitoring for Glucose Control in Type 1 Diabetes: The CORRIDA Randomized Controlled Trial.Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov;43(11):2744-2750. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0112. Epub 2020 Aug 28. Diabetes Care. 2020. PMID: 32859607 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Brief Review for Primary Care Practitioners.Adv Ther. 2019 Mar;36(3):579-596. doi: 10.1007/s12325-019-0870-x. Epub 2019 Jan 18. Adv Ther. 2019. PMID: 30659511 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Research Progress on the Application of CGM in Patients with Diabetes and Hemodialysis.Int J Med Sci. 2024 Nov 11;21(15):3083-3090. doi: 10.7150/ijms.102727. eCollection 2024. Int J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 39628691 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-invasive evaluation of advanced glycation end products in hair as early markers of diabetes and aging.Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 18;15(1):30232. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15481-z. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40825821
-
Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring Performance in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jul;19(4):1023-1034. doi: 10.1177/19322968241232686. Epub 2024 Mar 4. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025. PMID: 38439562 Free PMC article.
-
Flash Glucose Monitoring for Predicting Cardiogenic Shock Occurrence in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Pilot Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Mar 11;15(6):685. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15060685. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40150028 Free PMC article.
-
A case of type 1 diabetes mellitus and advanced chronic kidney disease in pregnancy: Which glucose monitoring system is the most accurate?Acta Diabetol. 2024 Mar;61(3):389-392. doi: 10.1007/s00592-023-02222-9. Epub 2023 Dec 26. Acta Diabetol. 2024. PMID: 38148343 No abstract available.
References
-
- Hirsch IB. Glycemic Variability and Diabetes Complications: Does It Matter? Of Course It Does! Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1610–1614. - PubMed
-
- Garber AJ, Handelsman Y, Grunberger G, Einhorn D, Abrahamson MJ, Barzilay JI, et al. Consensus Statement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology on the Comprehensive Type 2 Diabetes Management Algorithm – 2020 Executive Summary. Endocr Pract. 2020;26(1):107–139. - PubMed
-
- Beyond A1C Writing Group Need for Regulatory Change to Incorporate Beyond A1C Glycemic Metrics. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(6):e92–e94. - PubMed
-
- Bry L, Chen PC, Sacks DB. Effects of Hemoglobin Variants and Chemically Modified Derivatives on Assays for Glycohemoglobin. Clin Chem. 2001;47(2):153–163. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical