Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug;25(4):1844-1860.
doi: 10.1111/hex.13529. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis

Sosei Yamaguchi  1 , Makiko Abe  1 , Takayuki Kawaguchi  1 , Momoka Igarashi  1 , Takuma Shiozawa  1 , Makoto Ogawa  1 , Naonori Yasuma  1 , Sayaka Sato  1 , Yuki Miyamoto  2 , Chiyo Fujii  1
Affiliations

Multiple stakeholders' perspectives on patient and public involvement in community mental health services research: A qualitative analysis

Sosei Yamaguchi et al. Health Expect. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) has become essential in health research. However, little is known about multiple stakeholders' perspectives on the implementation of PPI in community mental health research settings. The present study aimed to qualitatively analyse multiple stakeholders' views on PPI, including potential concerns, barriers and approaches.

Methods: This study involved conducting focus group interviews and collecting qualitative data from 37 participants in multiple stakeholder groups (patients = 6, caregivers = 5, service providers = 7, government staff = 5 and researchers = 14) in the community mental health field. The data were qualitatively analysed using a data-driven approach that derived domains, themes and subthemes related to perspectives on PPI and to specific challenges and approaches for implementing PPI.

Results: The qualitative analysis identified four domains. The 'Positive views and expectations regarding PPI' domain consisted of themes related to supportive views of PPI in a mental health service research setting and improvements in the quality of research and service. The 'General concerns about PPI' domain included themes concerning the need for non-PPI research and tokenism, excessive expectations concerning social changes and use of evidence from PPI research, and heavy burdens resulting from PPI. The 'Specific issues regarding the implementation of PPI' domain consisted of four themes, including academic systems, selection methods (e.g., representativeness and conflict of interest issues), relationship building, and ambiguous PPI criteria. In particular, all stakeholder groups expressed concerns about relational equality during PPI implementation in Japan. The 'Approaches to PPI implementation' domain included themes such as facilitating mutual understanding, creating a tolerant atmosphere, establishing PPI support systems (e.g., training, ethics and human resource matching) and empowering patient organizations.

Conclusion: The study replicated most of the barriers and approaches to PPI reported by qualitative research in Western counties. However, utilization of evidence produced by PPI research and partnership in the PPI process may be particularly serious issues in Japan. Future PPI studies should carefully address solutions that fit each culture.

Patient or public contribution: A patient-researcher was involved in all stages of this project, from development of the research topic and the protocol to manuscript preparation.

Keywords: community mental health; focus group interview; mental health services research; patient and public involvement; qualitative analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. INVOLVE. Briefing notes for researchers: Public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Eastleigh: INVOLVE. 2012.
    1. The PARTNERS2 Writing Collective . Exploring patient and public involvement (PPI) and co‐production approaches in mental health research: learning from the PARTNERS2 research programme. Res Involv Engagem. 2020;6:56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pinfold V, Szymczynska P, Hamilton S, et al. Co‐production in mental health research: Reflections from the people study. Ment Health Rev J. 2015;20(4):220‐231.
    1. Costa DSJ, Mercieca‐Bebber R, Tesson S, Seidler Z, Lopez A‐L. Patient, client, consumer, survivor or other alternatives? A scoping review of preferred terms for labelling individuals who access healthcare across settings. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3):e025166. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Priebe S. Patients in mental healthcare should be referred to as patients and not service users. BJPsych Bull. 2021;45:1‐2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types