Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec 1;37(6):37-6.
doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2021-0178.

Aortic Root and Distal Arch Management During Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: Expanding Horizons

Affiliations
Review

Aortic Root and Distal Arch Management During Type A Aortic Dissection Repair: Expanding Horizons

Kaushalendra Rathore et al. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. .

Abstract

The management of Type A aortic dissection has evolved over a period of a decade or so, and contemporary reports are suggesting a paradigm shift from a conservative approach to complete excision of the diseased aorta including root and distal arch. Improved cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion techniques, better understanding of the cerebral perfusion, and wide-ranging obtainability of prosthetic conduits gave surgical teams numerous choices. With improving outcomes and maturing surgical techniques, surgeons are performing extensive resections of the diseased aorta, but there is no standard protocol as far as the extent of the proximal and distal diseased aortic tissue resection is concerned. Aortic root replacement is associated with good early- and long-term outcomes and proffered solution in young and stable patients, for that reason many busy centres are endorsing total arch replacement in complex distal aortic dissections. This systemic review is discussing contemporary literature and associated pros and cons during surgical decision-making for these high-risk cases.

Keywords: Angina; Aorta; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Decision; Dissecting Aneurysm; Perfusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. David TE. Surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(2):279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Poon SS, Theologou T, Harrington D, Kuduvalli M, Oo A, Field M. Hemiarch versus total aortic arch replacement in acute type A dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;5(3):156–173. doi: 10.21037/acs.2016.05.06. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vallabhajosyula P, Szeto WY. Management of the aortic arch and descending thoracic aorta for acute type A dissection: moving away from the "less is more" paradigm. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(1):106–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.04.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhu JM, Qi RD, Chen L, Liu W, Li CN, Fan ZM, et al. Sun LZ. Surgery for acute type A dissection using total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation: preservation of autologous brachiocephalic vessels. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;150(1):101–105. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Preventza O, Cervera R, Cooley DA, Bakaeen FG, Mohamed AS, Cheong BY, et al. Acute type I aortic dissection: traditional versus hybrid repair with antegrade stent delivery to the descending thoracic aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148(1):119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.055. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources